OCPBUGS-65623: Remove exception for monitoring OLM Progression condition#30754
OCPBUGS-65623: Remove exception for monitoring OLM Progression condition#30754pedjak wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
With openshift#30626 we can remove the exception for OLM momitoring tests.
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@pedjak: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cc @hongkailiu |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pedjak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
@pedjak: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node |
|
@jianzhangbjz: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/b86b5050-023c-11f1-8a25-8b8572ae219a-0 |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retitle OCPBUGS-65623: Remove exception for monitoring OLM Progression condition |
|
@pedjak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65623, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
time="2026-02-05T04:01:45Z" level=info msg="event interval matches ConnectionErrorDuringSingleNodeAPIServerTargetDown" locator="{Kind map[deployment:cluster-olm-operator hmsg:6dac4b5eb0 namespace:openshift-cluster-olm-operator]}" message="{OperatorStatusChanged Status for clusteroperator/olm changed: Degraded message changed from \"All is well\" to \"OperatorControllerStaticResourcesDegraded: \\\"/operand-assets/operator-controller/01-namespace-openshift-operator-controller.yaml\\\" (string): Get \\\"[https://172.30.0.1:443/api/v1/namespaces/openshift-operator-controller](https://172.30.0.1/api/v1/namespaces/openshift-operator-controller)\\\": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: connect: connection refused\\nOperatorControllerStaticResourcesDegraded: \\\"/operand-assets/operator-controller/02-openshift-operator-controller-networkpolicy-operator-controller-default-deny-all-traffic.yaml\\\" (string): Get \\\"[https://172.30.0.1:443/apis/networking.k8s.io/v1/namespaces/openshift-operator-controller/networkpolicies/operator-controller-default-deny-all-traffic](https://172.30.0.1/apis/networking.k8s.io/v1/namespaces/openshift-operator-controller/networkpolicies/operator-controller-default-deny-all-traffic)\\\": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: connect: connection refused\\nOperatorControllerStaticResourcesDegraded: |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65623, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node |
|
@jianzhangbjz: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/75795c40-026b-11f1-86ae-d8537768c738-0 |
|
As we discussed on Slack, this #30626 only skips the |
|
@pedjak: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/cluster-olm-operator#173
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/9b7f3b60-0380-11f1-90eb-7e61d802a20d-0 |
With merge of #30626 we can remove the exception for OLM
monitoring tests.