Skip to content

OSDOCS -17445 [ROSA] CQA Improvements on Assemblies #109160

Open
jc-berger wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
jc-berger:jcberger-17445-CQA-Assembly
Open

OSDOCS -17445 [ROSA] CQA Improvements on Assemblies #109160
jc-berger wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
jc-berger:jcberger-17445-CQA-Assembly

Conversation

@jc-berger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-17445

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 27, 2026
[role="_additional-resources"]
[id="additional-resources_operator-roles_{context}"]
.Additional resources
* link:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rosa/latest/userguide/security-iam-awsmanpol.html[AWS documentation for Managed IAM policies for {product-title} clusters] No newline at end of file
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewers:

Within the assembly, we constantly had this link included as an "additional resources" for each procedure/level 2 heading.

I don't think we need to be this redundant. However, since it's technically part of several different procedures, maybe it does need to be kept.

Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could probably take the duplicated links out of the modules and put them in a general Additional Resources in the holding Assembly.

[id="additional-resources_role-overview_{context}"]
.Additional resources
* link:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rosa/latest/userguide/security-iam-awsmanpol.html[AWS Managed IAM policies for {product-title} clusters]
include::modules/rosa-hcp-creating-account-wide-sts-roles-and-policies.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewers:

In the original assembly, all the level 2 headers included a procedure. So instead of making new modules, I simply added to the abstract/short description of the existing modules, and added an additional resources section since the assembly had one of those for each level 2.

Do you all like this approach instead of me making new modules for all these level 2 headers in the original assembly?

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 27, 2026

🤖 Fri Mar 27 18:16:56 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://109160--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2026

@jc-berger: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/validate-portal 4ab2f82 link true /test validate-portal

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@EricPonvelle EricPonvelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small comment, but looks good to me otherwise.

[role="_additional-resources"]
[id="additional-resources_operator-roles_{context}"]
.Additional resources
* link:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rosa/latest/userguide/security-iam-awsmanpol.html[AWS documentation for Managed IAM policies for {product-title} clusters] No newline at end of file
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could probably take the duplicated links out of the modules and put them in a general Additional Resources in the holding Assembly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants