-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
[WIP] DOCPLAN-31: Remove unnecessary module, move to admonition #104285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@abrennan89: This pull request references DOCPLAN-31 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
1608b57 to
30c7e26
Compare
|
@abrennan89: This pull request references DOCPLAN-31 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@abrennan89: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Version(s):
Will CP back as far as possible without conflicts; at least 4.20+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DOCPLAN-31
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
N/A
Additional information:
Per the CQA, it wasn't clear whether this section should be a procedure or a reference module. It was formatted as reference, but didn't really seem to fit that template. However, it also didn't make sense as a procedure module or even a
.Troubleshootingsection, since there isn't really a set of steps provided. I've opted to move this into a step in the main procedure meet migration requirements. The structure can be revisited during the JTBD work and CNV overall restructure later if required.