Skip to content

Conversation

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Dec 22, 2025

CQA for the bare-metal doc. Work will take many PRs due to the delicate structure of the install doc.

Probably best to contrast with OKD docs (as loading times are not an issue).

Continue the next PR from modules/installation-infrastructure-user-infra

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-17013

Link to docs preview:

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dfitzmau: No Jira issue with key upi-4 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

CQA for the bare-metal doc. Work will take many PRs due to the delicate structure of the install doc.

Probably best to contrast with OKD docs (as loading times are not an issue).

Continue the next PR from

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-17013

Link to docs preview:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Dec 22, 2025

🤖 Mon Dec 22 17:33:40 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://104267--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-17013-bm-upi-4 branch 4 times, most recently from aaebfb5 to 8ec55c1 Compare December 22, 2025 16:55
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 22, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-17013-bm-upi-4 branch 3 times, most recently from 73db72b to cc93eb8 Compare December 22, 2025 17:04
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dfitzmau: No Jira issue with key upi-4 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

CQA for the bare-metal doc. Work will take many PRs due to the delicate structure of the install doc.

Probably best to contrast with OKD docs (as loading times are not an issue).

Continue the next PR from modules/enabling-OVS-balance-slb-mode.adoc

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-17013

Link to docs preview:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-17013-bm-upi-4 branch from cc93eb8 to 751b6a3 Compare December 22, 2025 17:23
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dfitzmau: No Jira issue with key upi-4 exists in the tracker at https://issues.redhat.com/.
Once a valid jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request, request a refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

CQA for the bare-metal doc. Work will take many PRs due to the delicate structure of the install doc.

Probably best to contrast with OKD docs (as loading times are not an issue).

Continue the next PR from modules/installation-infrastructure-user-infra

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-17013

Link to docs preview:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2025

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants