Skip to content

Conversation

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

Should we wait for 4.22 to branch this friday or should we get this in to 4.21 ahead of the kube update

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

we can wait till branch I think

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/tide refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 24, 2025
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

Would you like to attach a Jira @haircommander or should we just NO-JIRA this in?

@haircommander haircommander changed the title kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage [NO-JIRA] kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage Jan 5, 2026
@haircommander haircommander changed the title [NO-JIRA] kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage NO-JIRA" kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage Jan 5, 2026
@haircommander haircommander changed the title NO-JIRA" kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage NO-JIRA: kubelet: drop pod-infra-container-image usage Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@haircommander: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 5, 2026
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

I think NO-JIRA works for this

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

This looks like a fair change based on the conversation here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, isabella-janssen, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jubittajohn
Copy link

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@jubittajohn
Copy link

/retest-required

@jacobsee
Copy link
Member

jacobsee commented Jan 7, 2026

/verified by @jacobsee

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jacobsee: This PR has been marked as verified by @jacobsee.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @jacobsee

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD af5adcc and 2 for PR HEAD 8c30ff7 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@haircommander: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit 8c30ff7 link false /test bootstrap-unit
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 8c30ff7 link false /test e2e-openstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jacobsee
Copy link
Member

jacobsee commented Jan 8, 2026

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@jacobsee
Copy link
Member

jacobsee commented Jan 8, 2026

/retest-required

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jan 8, 2026

/override ci/prow/okd-scos-images

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/okd-scos-images

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/okd-scos-images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson sdodson merged commit f8a3f57 into openshift:main Jan 8, 2026
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants