fix: Set tektonhub as the default catalog type for custom Hub URLs

[pratap0007]

When a custom hub URL is configured, default the catalog type to TektonHubType instead of ArtifactHubType.

Fixes: SRVKP-9248

📝 Description of the Change

👨🏻‍ Linked Jira

🔗 Linked GitHub Issue

Fixes #

🚀 Type of Change

• 🐛 Bug fix (fix:)
• ✨ New feature (feat:)
• 💥 Breaking change (feat!:, fix!:)
• 📚 Documentation update (docs:)
• ⚙️ Chore (chore:)
• 💅 Refactor (refactor:)
• 🔧 Enhancement (enhance:)
• 📦 Dependency update (deps:)

🧪 Testing Strategy

• Unit tests
• Integration tests
• End-to-end tests
• Manual testing
• Not Applicable

🤖 AI Assistance

• I have not used any AI assistance for this PR.
• I have used AI assistance for this PR.

If you have used AI assistance, please provide the following details:

Which LLM was used?

• GitHub Copilot
• ChatGPT (OpenAI)
• Claude (Anthropic)
• Cursor
• Gemini (Google)
• Other: ____________

Extent of AI Assistance:

• Documentation and research only
• Unit tests or E2E tests only
• Code generation (parts of the code)
• Full code generation (most of the PR)
• PR description and comments
• Commit message(s)

Important

If the majority of the code in this PR was generated by an AI, please add a Co-authored-by trailer to your commit message.
For example:

Co-authored-by: Gemini gemini@google.com
Co-authored-by: ChatGPT noreply@chatgpt.com
Co-authored-by: Claude noreply@anthropic.com
Co-authored-by: Cursor noreply@cursor.com
Co-authored-by: Copilot Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

**💡You can use the script ./hack/add-llm-coauthor.sh to automatically add
these co-author trailers to your commits.

✅ Submitter Checklist

• 📝 My commit messages are clear, informative, and follow the project's How to write a git commit message guide. The Gitlint linter ensures in CI it's properly validated
• ✨ I have ensured my commit message prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.
• ♽ I have run make test and make lint locally to check for and fix any
  issues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
  pre-commit and running pre-commit install to
  automate these checks.
• 📖 I have added or updated documentation for any user-facing changes.
• 🧪 I have added sufficient unit tests for my code changes.
• 🎁 I have added end-to-end tests where feasible. See README for more details.
• 🔎 I have addressed any CI test flakiness or provided a clear reason to bypass it.
• If adding a provider feature, I have filled in the following and updated the provider documentation:
  • GitHub App
  • GitHub Webhook
  • Gitea/Forgejo
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket Cloud
  • Bitbucket Data Center

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @pratap0007, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where custom Hub URLs were incorrectly defaulting to the "ArtifactHubType" catalog. The change introduces logic to automatically set the catalog type to "TektonHubType" when a non-default Hub URL is detected, improving the system's ability to correctly interpret and utilize custom hub configurations. This ensures that users leveraging custom hubs experience the intended Tekton Hub functionality by default.

Highlights

• Default Hub Catalog Type: When a custom Hub URL is provided, the default catalog type will now correctly be set to "TektonHubType" instead of "ArtifactHubType". This ensures that custom hubs are treated as Tekton Hubs by default, aligning with expected behavior for non-standard hub configurations.
• Test Coverage: A new test case has been added to verify that configuring a custom Hub URL correctly defaults the catalog type to "TektonHubType", ensuring the fix works as intended.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[pipelines-as-code]

🔍 PR Lint Feedback

Note: This automated check helps ensure your PR follows our contribution guidelines.

⚠️ Items that need attention:

🤖 AI attribution

The following commits lack an explicit AI attribution footer:

• bc2b3a5 Set tektonhub as the default catalog type for custom Hub URLs

If no AI assistance was used for a commit, you can ignore this warning.
Otherwise add an Assisted-by: or Co-authored-by: footer referencing the AI used.

---

ℹ️ Next Steps

• Review and address the items above
• Push new commits to update this PR
• This comment will be automatically updated when issues are resolved

🔧 Admin Tools (click to expand)

Automated Issue/Ticket Creation:

• /issue-create - Generate a GitHub issue from this PR content using AI
• /jira-create - Create a SRVKP Jira ticket from this PR content using AI

⚠️ Important: Always review and edit generated content before finalizing tickets/issues.
The AI-generated content should be used as a starting point and may need adjustments.

These commands are available to maintainers and will post the generated content as PR comments for review.

_{🤖 This feedback was generated automatically by the PR CI system}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes the default catalog type to TektonHubType when a custom Hub URL is provided, instead of ArtifactHubType. The accompanying unit tests have been updated appropriately to validate this new default behavior. My review includes one suggestion to simplify the conditional logic for better readability and maintainability.

[pratap0007]

/retest