Skip to content

Move the link farm to the top, to the same line as the header.#187

Open
jordanbrown0 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenscad:mainfrom
jordanbrown0:main
Open

Move the link farm to the top, to the same line as the header.#187
jordanbrown0 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenscad:mainfrom
jordanbrown0:main

Conversation

@jordanbrown0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It occurred to me that the link farm line at the bottom of the cheat sheet would fit to the right of the header, reducing the vertical size of the page, and would arguably be even better there.

I don't know of an easy way to view a github HTML page, but here's what it looks like at full width:

image

Note that github will squash the image here to fit.

I can't say that I'm super happy with the vertical spacing if you narrow the window further. It's usable, but not aesthetically pleasing. I expect that there's a way to move the entire line down if space requires, but I'd rather not mess with that until I get some buy-in on the overall concept. Let me know what you think. Here's what it looks like when taken narrower.

image
image

@MichaelAtOz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm not that fussed, but the usefulness of that line is pretty low (particularly the last item), it doesn't deserve to be prominent.

@jordanbrown0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Based on the available history, it looks like that last entry belongs to one of the authors of the cheat sheet, so I'm inclined to keep it as a hat tip to them.

The rest... shrug. Yeah, I have all of those URLs more or less memorized, but some people coming to the cheat sheet might not. If you don't have them memorized, then they are important. (Except for MCAD.)

And, appended to that header line, it's not taking up any more space.

But like I said, I'm not emotional about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants