Skip to content

Dismiss stale app-server requests after remote resolution#15134

Open
ebrevdo wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
ebrevdo/fix_approval_cancellation
Open

Dismiss stale app-server requests after remote resolution#15134
ebrevdo wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
ebrevdo/fix_approval_cancellation

Conversation

@ebrevdo
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrevdo ebrevdo commented Mar 19, 2026

Dismiss stale TUI app-server approvals after remote resolution

When an approval or elicitation request is resolved by another client, the tui_app_server now dismisses the matching local overlay instead of leaving stale UI behind and emitting a misleading local cancellation.

This change teaches pending app-server request tracking to map serverRequest/resolved notifications back to the concrete request type and stable request key, then propagates that resolved request into the bottom-pane overlay stack. Approval, request-user-input, and MCP elicitation overlays now drop the resolved current or queued request quietly, advance to the next queued request when present, and avoid emitting abort/cancel events for stale UI.

Tests were added to cover resolved-request mapping and overlay dismissal behavior so remote-resolution cleanup stays correct.

@ebrevdo ebrevdo marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2026 02:43
Copy link
Contributor

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0b33d70991

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant