Skip to content

Conversation

@okurz
Copy link
Member

@okurz okurz commented Apr 2, 2025

  • Prepare release of 1.1.0
  • README: Update POD using minilla
  • Try to prevent warnings about Formatter
  • Update Build.PL and META.json with minilla 3.1.25
  • Remove obsolete dependency on TAP::Formatter::Color

Copy link
Member

@Wabri Wabri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If META.json is autogenerated taking the author commits than I think we should leave as it is, otherwise change to suse mail

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.36%. Comparing base (73447c9) to head (d942c46).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

❌ Your changes status has failed because you have indirect coverage changes. Learn more about Unexpected Coverage Changes and reasons for indirect coverage changes.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #76      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.70%   89.36%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines         903      903              
  Branches      207      207              
==========================================
- Hits          810      807       -3     
  Misses         21       21              
- Partials       72       75       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@okurz
Copy link
Member Author

okurz commented Apr 2, 2025

If META.json is autogenerated taking the author commits than I think we should leave as it is, otherwise change to suse mail

It is auto-generated so I would leave it as-is unless we can fix what it does

@okurz
Copy link
Member Author

okurz commented Apr 2, 2025

Who can help me understand "codecov/changes
codecov/changes — 1 file has indirect coverage changes not visible in diff"?

@Wabri
Copy link
Member

Wabri commented Apr 2, 2025

@okurz
Copy link
Member Author

okurz commented Apr 2, 2025

I don't know what code changes codecov is referring to but we need this change merged so that we can do a proper release. Merging.

@okurz okurz merged commit 6a05891 into openSUSE:master Apr 2, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@okurz okurz deleted the feature/next branch April 2, 2025 17:00
@perlpunk
Copy link
Collaborator

perlpunk commented Apr 2, 2025

See #77 about the coverage

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants