Conversation
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️ Target:
|
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.13.4 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42003 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42004 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4 |
com.google.code.gson:gson |
CVE-2022-25647 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.4 | 2.8.9 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt |
CVE-2023-52428 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.8.1 | 9.37.2 |
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp |
CVE-2021-0341 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 4.9.2 |
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils |
CVE-2025-48734 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.9.4 | 1.11.0 |
commons-io:commons-io |
CVE-2024-47554 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.8.0 | 2.14.0 |
dnsjava:dnsjava |
CVE-2024-25638 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.1.7 | 3.6.0 |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2025-55163 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.100.Final |
io.netty:netty-handler |
CVE-2025-24970 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.118.Final |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2021-31684 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 1.3.3, 2.4.4 |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2023-1370 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 2.4.9 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2024-47561 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 1.7.7 | 1.11.4 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2023-39410 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.7.7 | 1.11.3 |
org.apache.derby:derby |
CVE-2022-46337 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 10.14.2.0 | 10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0 |
org.apache.ivy:ivy |
CVE-2022-46751 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 |
org.apache.mesos:mesos |
CVE-2018-1330 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.4.3 | 1.6.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2019-0205 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.13.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2020-13949 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.14.0 |
org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper |
CVE-2023-44981 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 3.6.3 | 3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1 |
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server |
CVE-2024-13009 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.4.56.v20240826 | 9.4.57.v20241219 |
org.lz4:lz4-java |
CVE-2025-12183 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Node.js
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Python
Vulnerabilities (10)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68438 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68675 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.3.0 | 6.1.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 6.0.1 | 6.1.0 |
starlette |
CVE-2025-62727 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.48.0 | 0.49.1 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66418 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66471 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2026-21441 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.3 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/extended_sample_data.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/lineage.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.json
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data_aut.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.json
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage_aut.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️ Target:
|
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
libpam-modules |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam-modules-bin |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam-runtime |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam0g |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Java
Vulnerabilities (33)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.13.4 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42003 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42004 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4 |
com.google.code.gson:gson |
CVE-2022-25647 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.4 | 2.8.9 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt |
CVE-2023-52428 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.8.1 | 9.37.2 |
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp |
CVE-2021-0341 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 4.9.2 |
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils |
CVE-2025-48734 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.9.4 | 1.11.0 |
commons-io:commons-io |
CVE-2024-47554 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.8.0 | 2.14.0 |
dnsjava:dnsjava |
CVE-2024-25638 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.1.7 | 3.6.0 |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2025-55163 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.100.Final |
io.netty:netty-handler |
CVE-2025-24970 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.118.Final |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2021-31684 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 1.3.3, 2.4.4 |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2023-1370 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 2.4.9 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2024-47561 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 1.7.7 | 1.11.4 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2023-39410 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.7.7 | 1.11.3 |
org.apache.derby:derby |
CVE-2022-46337 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 10.14.2.0 | 10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0 |
org.apache.ivy:ivy |
CVE-2022-46751 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 |
org.apache.mesos:mesos |
CVE-2018-1330 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.4.3 | 1.6.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2019-0205 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.13.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2020-13949 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.14.0 |
org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper |
CVE-2023-44981 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 3.6.3 | 3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1 |
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server |
CVE-2024-13009 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.4.56.v20240826 | 9.4.57.v20241219 |
org.lz4:lz4-java |
CVE-2025-12183 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Node.js
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Python
Vulnerabilities (20)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Werkzeug |
CVE-2024-34069 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.3 | 3.0.3 |
aiohttp |
CVE-2025-69223 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 3.13.3 |
aiohttp |
CVE-2025-69223 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.13.2 | 3.13.3 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68438 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68675 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
azure-core |
CVE-2026-21226 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.37.0 | 1.38.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.3.0 | 6.1.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.3.0 | 6.1.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 6.0.1 | 6.1.0 |
protobuf |
CVE-2026-0994 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.25.8 | 6.33.5 |
pyasn1 |
CVE-2026-23490 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.6.1 | 0.6.2 |
python-multipart |
CVE-2026-24486 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.0.20 | 0.0.22 |
ray |
CVE-2025-62593 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 2.47.1 | 2.52.0 |
starlette |
CVE-2025-62727 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.48.0 | 0.49.1 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66418 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66471 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2026-21441 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.3 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /home/airflow/openmetadata-airflow-apis/openmetadata_managed_apis.egg-info/PKG-INFO
No Vulnerabilities Found
46b9a0a to
d1a369b
Compare
|
This sampler doesn't rely on `RANDOM()` function but on the hash of certain columns. Then we use string comparison to retrieve those hashes below our reference hash string
d1a369b to
03ba57c
Compare
🔍 CI failure analysis for 03ba57c: Python integration test failing across all Python versions (3.10, 3.11) due to histogram frequency order reversal - requires code fixIssue - COMPLETE CI STATUS FOR COMMIT 03ba57cPython Test Failures:
All 3 Python test jobs failed with the SAME test: Error (consistent across all 3 jobs): AssertionError: objects mismatched on field: [histogram.frequencies],
expected: [[3, 2]], actual: [[2, 3]]Test Results: 1 failed, 532 passed, 21 skipped, 1 xfailed Playwright Tests:
Root CauseTHIS IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PR CHANGES - BLOCKING ISSUE The test failure is in the profiler integration test, directly related to code modified in this PR: What Changed: Commit
Impact: The histogram fix for PinotDB has changed the frequency ordering behavior, causing the postgres integration test to fail because it expects the original frequency order. Why This Is a Real Issue (Not Flaky):
AnalysisTest Details:
What This Means: The histogram frequency counts are being reversed. This could indicate:
Histogram Context: From the PR description, the histogram fix addresses: This suggests the fix converts floating point values to integers for PinotDB compatibility. This conversion or the associated bucket logic changes may have affected the frequency ordering. Why This Blocks the MergeUnlike the 3 flaky Playwright failures, this is a functional regression:
Current CI Summary:
Code Review ✅ Approved 5 resolved / 5 findingsBoth previously identified issues have been resolved: the debug log is now correctly placed inside the fallback condition, and the intersperse function now handles empty sequences properly with an early return. ✅ 5 resolved✅ Bug: Debug log always printed regardless of column selection result
✅ Edge Case: intersperse function fails with empty sequence
✅ Bug: Unused variable `table_query` in row sampling code path
✅ Bug: Negative hash values cause incorrect sampling percentages
✅ Security: SQL injection risk in hash expression construction
Tip Comment OptionsAuto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch. Comment with these commands to change:
Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar |



Describe your changes:
While testing Pinot profiler for 1.12 I discovered that PinotDB does not support
RANDOM()function used for other DBs to build the sampling query.This PR creates a sampler specific for trino that uses hashes and modular arithmetic to achieve a sampling mechanism that doesn't rely on random generator functions.
Here's the error output when running the profiler against trino with sampling enabled
After fixing the issue above, I encountered the following issue with histograms, which is also fixed in this PR
```text 'Received error query execution result block: ' '{200=QueryExecutionError:\n' 'org.apache.pinot.spi.exception.BadQueryRequestException: ' 'java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "195.0"\n' '\tat ' 'org.apache.pinot.core.operator.filter.predicate.PredicateEvaluatorProvider.getPredicateEvaluator(PredicateEvaluatorProvider.java:94)\n' '\tat ' 'org.apache.pinot.core.operator.filter.predicate.PredicateEvaluatorProvider.getPredicateEvaluator(PredicateEvaluatorProvider.java:100)\n' '\tat ' 'org.apache.pinot.core.plan.FilterPlanNode.constructPhysicalOperator(FilterPlanNode.java:310)\n' '\tat ' 'org.apache.pinot.core.plan.FilterPlanNode.constructPhysicalOperator(FilterPlanNode.java:201)\n' '...\n' 'Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: ' '"195.0"\n' '\tat ' 'java.base/java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:67)\n' '\tat java.base/java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:711)\n' '\tat java.base/java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:836)\n' '\tat ' 'org.apache.pinot.segment.local.segment.index.readers.LongDictionary.insertionIndexOf(LongDictionary.java:44)}\n' 'org.apache.pinot.query.service.dispatch.QueryDispatcher.runReducer(QueryDispatcher.java:306)\n' 'org.apache.pinot.query.service.dispatch.QueryDispatcher.submitAndReduce(QueryDispatcher.java:96)\n' 'org.apache.pinot.broker.requesthandler.MultiStageBrokerRequestHandler.handleRequest(MultiStageBrokerRequestHandler.java:219)\n' 'org.apache.pinot.broker.requesthandler.BaseBrokerRequestHandler.handleRequest(BaseBrokerRequestHandler.java:133)\n'} `` `Type of change:
Checklist: