Skip to content

Add FAQ for Object State#134

Draft
mikeradka wants to merge 8 commits into
ocsf:mainfrom
mikeradka:doc_prev_current_diff_future
Draft

Add FAQ for Object State#134
mikeradka wants to merge 8 commits into
ocsf:mainfrom
mikeradka:doc_prev_current_diff_future

Conversation

@mikeradka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Related Issue: ocsf-schema/issues/1601
Realized by Related PR: ocsf-schema/pull/1597

This PR adds an FAQ to describe how OCSF conventions handle pre/post event state for entities.

@mikeradka mikeradka requested a review from jasonbreimer April 14, 2026 15:36
@mikeradka mikeradka added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 14, 2026
@mikeradka mikeradka changed the title Add FAQ for Entity State Add FAQ for Object State Apr 22, 2026
@mikeradka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR is on hold until this is convention is definitively sorted.

mikeradka added a commit to ocsf/ocsf-schema that referenced this pull request May 27, 2026
#### Related Issue: 

- #1601

#### Related PRs:

- #1597 

- ocsf/ocsf-docs#134

#### Description of changes:

This PR deprecates the `_result` attributes that are used to represent
updates to an object, in lieu of using the new `updated_` convention.

| Deprecated  | New | Committed |
| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | 
| `entity_result` | `updated_entity` | ✅ |
| `file_result` | `updated_file`. Address new `link_target` object in
separate PR. | ✅|
| `resources_result` | `updated_resources` | ✅ |
| `web_resources_result` | `updated_web_resources` | ✅
|

Also added a few project words for the linter (`metaschemas`, `CLSID`),
fixed a previous typo in CHANGELOG, and cleaned up minor json
whitespace.

# Vote Here:

👍 : deprecate these attributes in 1.9
👎 : do not deprecate these attributes in 1.9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants