Skip to content

doc(minutes): add 11 Mar 2026 #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
JakobJingleheimer merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2026
+25 −0
Merged

doc(minutes): add 11 Mar 2026 #22

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 25 additions & 0 deletions minutes/2026-03-11 test-runner meeting minutes.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# 11 March 2026

## Attendees

* Diogo de Souza [@sozua](https://github.com/sozua)
* Jacob Smith [@JakobJingleheimer](https://github.com/JakobJingleheimer) (chair)
* Pietro Marchini [@pmarchini](https://github.com/pmarchini)

## Topics

* doc(proposal): un/break --test [nodejs/test-runner#13](https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/pull/13)
* change test flag to subcommand? `node --test` → `node test`
* High-impact suggestions from Colin [nodejs/test-runner#21](https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/issues/21)

## Outcomes

* From a technical standpoint, a `test` subcommand appears to be much easier than we expected.
* It's however not obvious why this is not used more. We suspect it might be due to the breaking change where `node test` would have run `node ./test.js` (or `node ./test/index.js`)
Comment on lines +17 to +18
Copy link
Member

@atlowChemi atlowChemi Mar 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I couldn't attend the meeting.
This was also discussed back when Yagiz added node --run and in nodejs/node#53483

Seems relevant as well

Copy link
Member Author

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer Mar 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huzzah! There is where that discussion was! I knew I wasn't crazy. Thank you 🙏


## Todos

* @JakobJingleheimer: To ask around about lack of subcommands
* Antoine FtW: it's indeed because of the breaking change suspected in the above discussion.
* @JakobJingleheimer: To keep an ear to the ground for the TC39 discussion about relaxing the requirement for dynamic import to always return the same.
* Consolidate `defaultExport` & `namedExports` [nodejs/node#61727](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/61727) needs some reviews and some opinions on whether old or new should "win" a conflict.