Skip to content

Conversation

@SystemKeeper
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Currently we do update and delete in 2 separate transactions -> do it in one, I don't see a reason to have two here.
  • If the background job expired, rollback the transaction and stop the execution

Signed-off-by: Marcel Müller <marcel-mueller@gmx.de>
@SystemKeeper SystemKeeper requested a review from Ivansss January 4, 2026 11:11
@SystemKeeper
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It was a single transcation before 9112c0e#diff-eba5e69a1812d1585a2db89ef47e4a8f93434c27a992790126e164b7e36aa170. I don't see why we shouldn't do it in one?

@SystemKeeper
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/backport to stable22

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants