fix(column): validate interface rather than the instance type

[susnux]

We cannot use instanceof because two apps will have different libraries so the prototype is not the same and the check will always fail.
Instead validate the column using the already existing validation method.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 58.82353% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.64%. Comparing base (eaac8df) to head (6a3a582).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/navigation/column.ts	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
lib/navigation/view.ts	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lib/utils/objectValidation.ts	75.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1442      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.23%   89.64%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          25       26       +1     
  Lines         706      705       -1     
  Branches      190      189       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          630      632       +2     
+ Misses         63       59       -4     
- Partials       13       14       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ShGKme]

Fixes the issue, but I'm not very fond of the solution..

IMO, validation properties is neither reliable (no guarantee it actually checks the type) nor direct way to check the type (we check properties, not type).

I'd either expect using classes and then check the constructor name (like instancof, but a string, so no cross-frontend issues). Or allowing using data objects and then adding a flag property like __view__ so we can only check a single private property added by the instance builder/creator.

And if the goal is to replace TS with JS in runtime, I'd consider using one of some good libraries to transform type declaration into validation, to not write the same checks over and over...

[susnux]

Agree. I think for the pure data objects like view, filter or column we should have a better way.
But the previous class approach was very inflexible because it was not possible to extend the classes to add state.