Skip to content

Conversation

@susnux
Copy link
Contributor

@susnux susnux commented Dec 21, 2025

Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <opensource@fthiessen.de>
@susnux susnux requested review from CarlSchwan and artonge December 21, 2025 23:59
@susnux susnux added 3. to review 3️⃣ Waiting for reviews type: refactor ♻️ Refactor code (not a bug fix, not a feature just refactoring) labels Dec 21, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.47%. Comparing base (784c3ff) to head (2647084).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1440   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.47%   89.47%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines         703      703           
  Branches      194      194           
=======================================
  Hits          629      629           
  Misses         62       62           
  Partials       12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@susnux susnux requested a review from ShGKme December 22, 2025 12:31
Comment on lines +12 to +13
folder: IFolder,
contents: INode[]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No ESLint here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not v9 yet 😔

@susnux susnux merged commit f596764 into main Dec 22, 2025
11 checks passed
@susnux susnux deleted the fix/types branch December 22, 2025 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review 3️⃣ Waiting for reviews type: refactor ♻️ Refactor code (not a bug fix, not a feature just refactoring)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants