Open
Conversation
9b70c0e to
dfb79e3
Compare
cba566a to
302586e
Compare
Author
|
Is there something wrong with the implementation? I could help but got no response. |
Contributor
|
@dg What do you think? |
Member
|
Please can you add simple test? |
4c0e8d0 to
e17242a
Compare
f9fc19d to
dd75e74
Compare
cce6a9c to
7e705c5
Compare
9acf825 to
a268c60
Compare
a56e7fe to
d9b5f29
Compare
cdb8832 to
a1798c0
Compare
1769a67 to
b02f117
Compare
2d78899 to
2f04c73
Compare
e8459f8 to
23617a8
Compare
2da238e to
038bab3
Compare
d3018bd to
9dc391a
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A new
inTransaction()method might be a very useful shortcut.Calling is unnecessary long right now.
Why not just use it like this?
Other shortcuts like
beginTransaction(),commit()androllback()are already implemented inConnectionclass.