Skip to content

Part #686, Update cFS Bundle for v7.0.1#153

Merged
dzbaker merged 15 commits into
mainfrom
dev
May 11, 2026
Merged

Part #686, Update cFS Bundle for v7.0.1#153
dzbaker merged 15 commits into
mainfrom
dev

Conversation

@dzbaker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dzbaker dzbaker commented Apr 7, 2026

This PR brings together the latest patches for SC.

jphickey and others added 15 commits April 2, 2026 14:55
Packet Definition Files

Squashed commit of the following:

commit 350bf483ad5ca3d8f9b9888501f3c3fe3d0f80b6
Author: Cameron Sykes <cameron.j.sykes@nasa.gov>
Date:   Fri Mar 27 11:47:59 2026 -0400

    Fix #25, Clang format

commit 34024625acc86931474eab5880f4bb020932a8a7
Author: Cameron Sykes <cameron.j.sykes@nasa.gov>
Date:   Fri Mar 20 11:29:15 2026 -0400

    Fix #25, Adjust padding for Continue-ATS-On-Failure command
Part cFS/Documents#11, Merge Internal Updates
…te-existing-workflows-internal-logic

Part cFS/workflows#177, Update Existing Workflows with Internal Logic
…internal-workflows

Part cFS/workflows#122, Add Internal Workflows
Use uint8 for the TLM bitmasks, which allows for a much simpler
macro that should actually work
Updates to match the change made in #29.  Somehow this was missed in the
first commit.
The default definition for the ATS table did not agree wtih the default
name in the registry for the ATS table.
The ATS validation requires that all entries are aligned to a 32 bit
boundary, but the table definition was not ensuring this.  It also had
an explicit size of 0 on the first entry (invalid) which prevented
loading.
Fix cFS/cFS#686, Merge v7.0.1 Internal Updates
…te-codeql-logic

Part cFS/workflows#136, Update CodeQL Logic
@dzbaker dzbaker changed the title Part cFS/Documents#11, Merging Development Branch Part #686, Update cFS Bundle for v7.0.1 May 11, 2026
@dzbaker dzbaker requested a review from jphickey May 11, 2026 18:02
@dzbaker dzbaker merged commit 28e973b into main May 11, 2026
36 of 37 checks passed
@chillfig chillfig added this to the v7.0.1 milestone May 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants