Skip to content

Conversation

@akuttruff
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need to get updated in the gemspec as well and you'll probably want to loosen the dependency up a bit. ~> 1.2.0 would be better

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comma was removed here and needs to be added back.

Also agree that the we want to keep the ~> specification.

@mtodd
Copy link
Owner

mtodd commented Nov 21, 2014

Thanks for this! Just a few minor fixes and there shouldn't be any problem with moving forward with this.

NOTE: I've not tested this change and don't intend to (this project is not actively maintained by me or anyone). I highly recommend you build a prerelease gem from this branch, vendor it in your app, and test it out locally to confirm these changes work as you expect. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants