Skip to content

Conversation

@chengwenxi
Copy link
Contributor

@chengwenxi chengwenxi commented Jan 23, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configurations with permission declarations.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a permissions block granting read access to repository contents across three GitHub Actions workflow files (build, lint, and test). No changes were made to job logic, steps, or environment variables.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Permissions
\.github/workflows/build\.yml, \.github/workflows/lint\.yml, \.github/workflows/test\.yml
Added permissions.contents: read block to each workflow to explicitly grant read access to repository contents during workflow execution.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Three workflows now wear their badges with pride,
With read-only keys they open wide,
Repository contents in view,
Permissions done clean and true! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and specifically describes the main change: adding permissions blocks to workflow files to grant read access to repository contents.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@chengwenxi chengwenxi merged commit 941e9a1 into main Jan 23, 2026
9 checks passed
@chengwenxi chengwenxi deleted the workflows branch January 23, 2026 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants