Propose to improve p04-08
#206
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR corrects a numbering error in the documentation for Puzzle 04's introduction to LayoutTensor. The numbered list that outlines LayoutTensor's key features had incorrect sequential numbering (1, 3, 4 instead of 1, 2, 3), which has been fixed.
Changes:
- Fixed the numbered list in the LayoutTensor introduction to use sequential numbering (1, 2, 3)
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 19 out of 19 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
…_layout_tensor.md`.
…`, and `UnsafePointer` components.
… unnecessary `UnsafePointer` imports from `p05` problem and solution files.
…lutions and problems.
…or` and `barrier`.
tolgacangoz
force-pushed
the
improve-p04
branch
from
cc47359 to
cfa391e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| # Note: barrier is not strictly needed here since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location. | ||
| # However, it's included to teach proper shared memory synchronization patterns | ||
| # for more complex scenarios where threads need to coordinate access to shared data. | ||
| # For this specific puzzle, we can remove the barrier since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing an annotation @tolgacangoz :
# For this specific puzzle, we can remove the barrier since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought it was an unnecessary comment since it didn't do what it said. And it was already said: "barrier is not strictly needed here since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location."
| # Note: barrier is not strictly needed here since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location. | ||
| # However, it's included to teach proper shared memory synchronization patterns | ||
| # for more complex scenarios where threads need to coordinate access to shared data. | ||
| # For this specific puzzle, we can remove the barrier since each thread only accesses its own shared memory location. |
|
Thanks for merging! |
3 participants
Thanks a lot for this implementation-based learning environment!