Developer Lightspeed guide enhancement: Improved LLM configuration procedures#350
Developer Lightspeed guide enhancement: Improved LLM configuration procedures#350Pkylas007 wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
…ls for proxy service Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 3 minutes and 28 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated LLM proxy enablement documentation: added the "LLM base URL" ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Pkylas007
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/proc_tackle-enable-llm-proxy.adoc (1)
36-57:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorSeparate the non-proxy path from this proxy-enablement procedure.
At Line 36 and Line 56, the procedure now mixes two incompatible flows (“enable proxy” vs “without proxy”), which conflicts with the module title and causes downstream mismatch with verification steps focused on Solution Server/proxy deployment.
Based on learnings: In migtools/mta-documentation, do not flag or review cross-reference (xref) anchor ID mismatches or broken xrefs in AsciiDoc (.adoc) files.✍️ Proposed documentation fix
-. Complete one of the following Tackle configurations: -.. Enable LLM proxy and the Solution Server in the Tackle CR: +. Configure the Tackle CR to enable LLM proxy (and optionally Solution Server): ... -.. Enter the LLM configurations in the Tackle CR to use the LLM without the proxy service: -+ -[source, yaml] ----- ---- -kind: Tackle -apiVersion: tackle.konveyor.io/v1alpha1 -metadata: - name: mta - namespace: openshift-mta -spec: - kai_llm_provider: <provider-name> `#For` example, OpenAI. - # optional, pick a suitable model for your provider - kai_llm_model: <model-name> - kai_llm_baseurl: "https://<serving-name>-<data-science-project-name>.apps.mta-ai.example.com/v1" ---- ----- + +// Move the non-proxy example to a separate procedure/module +// (for example: "Configuring LLM in Tackle CR without proxy service")🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/proc_tackle-enable-llm-proxy.adoc` around lines 36 - 57, The procedure mixes two incompatible flows (proxy-enabled vs non-proxy) in the same section; split them into two distinct subsections: one titled "Enable LLM proxy and Solution Server" containing the Tackle CR sample with kai_llm_proxy_enabled: true, kai_solution_server_enabled: true, kai_llm_provider, kai_llm_model and kai_llm_baseurl, and a separate subsection titled "Use LLM without proxy" containing the alternate Tackle CR (without kai_llm_proxy_enabled/kai_solution_server_enabled and with provider/model/baseurl as appropriate); update any verification steps and headings to reference the correct subsection so the module title matches the proxy workflow and there is no cross-flow content.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/proc_tackle-enable-llm-proxy.adoc`:
- Around line 36-57: The procedure mixes two incompatible flows (proxy-enabled
vs non-proxy) in the same section; split them into two distinct subsections: one
titled "Enable LLM proxy and Solution Server" containing the Tackle CR sample
with kai_llm_proxy_enabled: true, kai_solution_server_enabled: true,
kai_llm_provider, kai_llm_model and kai_llm_baseurl, and a separate subsection
titled "Use LLM without proxy" containing the alternate Tackle CR (without
kai_llm_proxy_enabled/kai_solution_server_enabled and with
provider/model/baseurl as appropriate); update any verification steps and
headings to reference the correct subsection so the module title matches the
proxy workflow and there is no cross-flow content.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 261f45f0-43cc-456a-85a3-00dd2b091f74
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_developer-lightspeed-pathways.adocdocs/topics/developer-lightspeed/proc_tackle-enable-llm-proxy.adoc
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
1 participant
JIRA
Preview
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation