-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 602
[AutoPR- Security] Patch curl for CVE-2025-14017 [MEDIUM] #15474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
azurelinux-security
wants to merge
2
commits into
microsoft:3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/curl/3.0/1022846
base: 3.0-dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
[AutoPR- Security] Patch curl for CVE-2025-14017 [MEDIUM] #15474
azurelinux-security
wants to merge
2
commits into
microsoft:3.0-dev
from
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/curl/3.0/1022846
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
a35d924 to
3230d0c
Compare
Contributor
Contributor
|
Buddy build passed. |
mfrw
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2026
Member
mfrw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Patch applies cleanly
- Patch looks good w.r.t upstream
- Validation pipelines pass
- Signed-Off By: @mfrw
LGTM
| + server = ldap_sslinit(host, (curl_ldap_num_t)conn->primary.remote_port, 1); | ||
| + else | ||
| +#else | ||
| + server = ldap_init(host, (curl_ldap_num_t)conn->primary.remote_port); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Patch looks good w.r.t upstream
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev
PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0
AI Backport
AutoPR-Security
Packaging
ready-for-stable-review
PR has passed initial review and is now ready for a second-level stable maintainer review
security
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Auto Patch curl for CVE-2025-14017.
Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1022846&view=results
Merge Checklist
All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)
*-staticsubpackages, etc.) have had theirReleasetag incremented../cgmanifest.json,./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json,.github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md,./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)*.signatures.jsonfilessudo make go-tidy-allandsudo make go-test-coveragepassSummary
What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?
YES/NO
Associated issues
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology