Feat/workflow automation pillar by rbmathis · Pull Request #82 · microsoft/agentrc

rbmathis · 2026-03-23T21:24:12Z

feat: add workflow-automation pillar with 6 new scored criteria

Add a new 'workflow-automation' pillar (repo-health group) with five new
checkers and six scored criteria covering process automation signals that
reduce engineering friction per PR:

New checkers (checkers.ts + monolithic readiness.ts):

hasIssueTemplates: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ dir or flat ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
hasCommitConvention: commitlint config files or @commitlint/* devDeps
hasReleaseAutomation: .releaserc/.changeset config or workflow scan
hasAutoLabeler: .github/labeler.yml or actions/labeler workflow reference
hasBranchRulesets: .github/rulesets/*.json or branch-protection.json

New criteria (workflow-automation pillar):

issue-templates (L2, high impact, low effort)
pr-template (L2, high impact, low effort) — promoted from extras
commit-convention (L3, high impact, low effort)
pr-labeling (L3, medium impact, low effort)
release-automation (L4, high impact, medium effort)

New criterion (security-governance pillar):

branch-protection (L3, high impact, medium effort)

Supporting changes:

types.ts: add 'workflow-automation' to ReadinessPillar union and PILLAR_GROUPS
scoring.ts: add 'Workflow Automation' display name
extras.ts: remove pr-template (now a scored criterion)
policy/adapter.ts: add 'workflow-automation' to PILLAR_NAMES

Tests: update baseline/adapter tests for new pillar count and criterion IDs;
add 30 new integration tests covering all new criteria pass/fail scenarios

Various doc updates

Add a new 'workflow-automation' pillar (repo-health group) with five new checkers and six scored criteria covering process automation signals that reduce engineering friction per PR: New checkers (checkers.ts + monolithic readiness.ts): - hasIssueTemplates: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ dir or flat ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md - hasCommitConvention: commitlint config files or @commitlint/* devDeps - hasReleaseAutomation: .releaserc/.changeset config or workflow scan - hasAutoLabeler: .github/labeler.yml or actions/labeler workflow reference - hasBranchRulesets: .github/rulesets/*.json or branch-protection.json New criteria (workflow-automation pillar): - issue-templates (L2, high impact, low effort) - pr-template (L2, high impact, low effort) — promoted from extras - commit-convention (L3, high impact, low effort) - pr-labeling (L3, medium impact, low effort) - release-automation (L4, high impact, medium effort) New criterion (security-governance pillar): - branch-protection (L3, high impact, medium effort) Supporting changes: - types.ts: add 'workflow-automation' to ReadinessPillar union and PILLAR_GROUPS - scoring.ts: add 'Workflow Automation' display name - extras.ts: remove pr-template (now a scored criterion) - policy/adapter.ts: add 'workflow-automation' to PILLAR_NAMES Tests: update baseline/adapter tests for new pillar count and criterion IDs; add 30 new integration tests covering all new criteria pass/fail scenarios

…nd adjust references to 10 pillars

Copilot

Pull request overview

Adds a new Workflow Automation readiness pillar to AgentRC’s readiness model, expanding repo-health scoring signals around process automation and governance.

Changes:

Introduces the workflow-automation pillar and new scored criteria (issue templates, PR templates, commit convention, PR labeling, release automation), plus a new branch-protection criterion under security/governance.
Implements new repository checkers to detect the above signals (files/configs + lightweight workflow scanning).
Updates tests and documentation to reflect 10 pillars and the new criteria/extras set.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 21 out of 21 changed files in this pull request and generated 17 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
vscode-extension/resources/walkthrough/readiness.md	Updates walkthrough text to 10 pillars and lists the new pillar.
vscode-extension/README.md	Updates extension README to 10 pillars.
src/services/tests/readiness.test.ts	Adds integration tests for new criteria and ensures new pillar is present.
src/services/tests/readiness-baseline.test.ts	Updates baselines for pillar IDs, criteria IDs, and extras IDs.
src/services/tests/policy-adapter.test.ts	Updates expected pillar count to 10.
packages/core/src/services/readiness/types.ts	Adds `workflow-automation` to the modular readiness pillar union/groups.
packages/core/src/services/readiness/scoring.ts	Adds “Workflow Automation” display name mapping.
packages/core/src/services/readiness/extras.ts	Removes `pr-template` from extras (now a scored criterion).
packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts	Adds the new scored criteria (and `branch-protection`) to the modular criteria builder.
packages/core/src/services/readiness/checkers.ts	Adds new repo checkers for workflow automation + branch protection detection.
packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts	Mirrors the new pillar/criteria/checkers in the monolithic exported readiness entrypoint.
packages/core/src/services/policy/adapter.ts	Adds pillar display name mapping for `workflow-automation`.
docs/policies.md	Updates extras list from 4 → 3 (removes `pr-template`).
docs/maturity-models.md	Adds canonical maturity model documentation (new file).
docs/maturity-in-practice.md	Adds companion adoption guidance doc (new file).
docs/dev/product.md	Updates product brief to 10 pillars.
docs/concepts.md	Updates concepts doc to include workflow automation and 10 pillars.
docs/commands.md	Updates readiness command docs to 10 pillars + links maturity models.
README.md	Updates root README to 10 pillars and links new docs.
CHANGELOG.md	Adds changelog entry for the new pillar and criteria.
.github/prompts/generate-improvements.prompt.md	Updates prompt context to reference 10 pillars.

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:48Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts

+          const templatePath = path.join(context.repoPath, ".github", "PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md");
+          const content = await fs.readFile(templatePath, "utf8");
+          const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);
+          return {
+            status: "pass",
+            reason: hasLinkedIssue
+              ? undefined
+              : 'PR template found but lacks a linked-issue reference ("Fixes #", "Closes #"). Add one to enable automatic issue closing on merge.'
+          };


/fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/ can match substrings inside other words (e.g. "preFIXES #"), causing false positives and suppressing the advisory reason. Consider adding word boundaries (e.g. \bfixes\b) and optionally allowing common punctuation like Fixes: #.

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on this feedback

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:48Z

docs/concepts.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Concepts
+# Concepts


Line 1 appears to include a UTF-8 BOM (invisible character before # Concepts). Recommend removing it to avoid encoding-related issues.

Suggested change

# Concepts

# Concepts

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:48Z

.github/prompts/generate-improvements.prompt.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
---
+---


The opening frontmatter delimiter appears to have a UTF-8 BOM prefix (invisible character before ---). Some frontmatter parsers treat this as a different token and will fail to detect the header. Remove the BOM so the delimiter is exactly ---.

Suggested change

---

---

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:49Z

docs/maturity-models.md

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card


Line 1 appears to include a UTF-8 BOM (invisible character before the # heading). Suggest removing it to avoid encoding-related issues.

Suggested change

# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card

# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card

packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:51Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

+          const templatePath = path.join(context.repoPath, ".github", "PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md");
+          const content = await fs.readFile(templatePath, "utf8");
+          const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);
+          return {
+            status: "pass",
+            reason: hasLinkedIssue
+              ? undefined
+              : 'PR template found but lacks a linked-issue reference ("Fixes #", "Closes #"). Add one to enable automatic issue closing on merge.'
+          };


The linked-issue detection regex can match substrings inside other words, which may incorrectly treat a template as containing "Fixes #" and omit the advisory reason. Adding word boundaries (and optionally supporting Fixes: #) would make this check more accurate.

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:52Z

docs/dev/product.md

+# AgentRC — Product Brief



Line 1 appears to include a UTF-8 BOM (invisible character before the # heading). Removing the BOM will prevent encoding/tooling quirks and keeps diffs clean.

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:52Z

README.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# AgentRC
+# AgentRC


Line 1 appears to include a UTF-8 BOM (invisible character before # AgentRC). Consider removing the BOM to avoid tooling/rendering quirks and reduce diff noise.

Suggested change

# AgentRC

# AgentRC

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:29:52Z

docs/maturity-in-practice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# SDLC Readiness Assessment: Toward Level-5 Agentic Delivery


Line 1 appears to include a UTF-8 BOM (invisible character before the # heading). Recommend removing it to keep the file encoding consistent.

Suggested change

# SDLC Readiness Assessment: Toward Level-5 Agentic Delivery

# SDLC Readiness Assessment: Toward Level-5 Agentic Delivery

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 21 out of 21 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts:1642

This helper makes branch-protection.md / branch_protection.md count as “branch protection configured”, which can yield false positives (it’s just documentation). Consider restricting this check to actual config files (.github/rulesets/*.json, .github/branch-protection.json) so the readiness signal reflects enforcement rather than docs.

  const rootFiles = await safeReadDir(repoPath);
  if (
    rootFiles.some(
      (f) =>
        f.toLowerCase() === "branch_protection.md" || f.toLowerCase() === "branch-protection.md"
    )
  )
    return true;
  return fileExists(path.join(repoPath, ".github", "branch-protection.json"));

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:00Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

+        try {
+          const templatePath = path.join(context.repoPath, ".github", "PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md");
+          const content = await fs.readFile(templatePath, "utf8");
+          const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);


Same issue as in the core criteria: /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/ can match inside other words and produce false positives. Use word boundaries / stricter parsing for linked-issue keywords so the advisory reason isn’t skipped accidentally.

This issue also appears on line 1634 of the same file.

Suggested change

const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);

const hasLinkedIssue = /\b(?:fixes|closes|resolves)\s+#/iu.test(content);

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:00Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

+          reason: found
+            ? undefined
+            : "No branch ruleset or protection config found (.github/rulesets/*.json or .github/branch-protection.json). Add branch protection rules to prevent unreviewed merges.",
+          evidence: [".github/rulesets/*.json", ".github/branch-protection.json"]
+        };


The failure reason mentions only .github/rulesets/*.json, but the evidence list also includes .github/branch-protection.json. Update the message to include both locations (or align evidence/message) so users know all supported config options.

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:00Z

docs/maturity-models.md

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card


This new doc file starts with a UTF-8 BOM (U+FEFF) before the heading. Please remove the BOM and save as UTF-8 without BOM to avoid subtle Markdown rendering/anchor issues in different viewers.

Suggested change

# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card

# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:00Z

docs/dev/product.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# AgentRC — Product Brief
+# AgentRC — Product Brief


This file now starts with a UTF-8 BOM (U+FEFF) before the heading. Please remove the BOM and save as UTF-8 without BOM to avoid subtle Markdown rendering/anchor issues.

Suggested change

# AgentRC — Product Brief

# AgentRC — Product Brief

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:01Z

vscode-extension/README.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup
+# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup


This file now starts with a UTF-8 BOM (U+FEFF) before the heading. Please remove the BOM and save as UTF-8 without BOM; BOMs can cause odd rendering in VS Code walkthrough/markdown contexts.

Suggested change

# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup

# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup

Copilot · 2026-03-23T21:38:01Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts

+        try {
+          const templatePath = path.join(context.repoPath, ".github", "PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md");
+          const content = await fs.readFile(templatePath, "utf8");
+          const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);


The linked-issue detection regex can match substrings inside other words (e.g. "preFIXES #"), which will suppress the advisory reason incorrectly. Tighten the pattern with word boundaries (and optionally allow punctuation like "Fixes: #") so only real keywords trigger a match.

Suggested change

const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#|closes\s+#|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);

const hasLinkedIssue = /\b(?:fixes|closes|resolves)\b\s*:?\s*#/iu.test(content);

rbmathis · 2026-03-23T21:38:23Z

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

rbmathis · 2026-03-23T22:10:00Z

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

…ity across multiple files

…MSBart2/agentrc into feat/workflow-automation-pillar

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 21 out of 21 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts:552

pr-labeling can pass via .github/labeler.yaml/.json or a workflow referencing actions/labeler, but the evidence list only includes .github/labeler.yml. Align evidence (and/or the failure reason) with what hasAutoLabeler() actually checks so users know all valid configurations.

        const found = await hasAutoLabeler(context.repoPath);
        return {
          status: found ? "pass" : "fail",
          reason: found
            ? undefined
            : "No PR auto-labeler configured (.github/labeler.yml or actions/labeler workflow). Auto-labeling routes PRs to the right reviewers without manual triage.",
          evidence: [".github/labeler.yml"]
        };

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts:951

pr-labeling can pass via .github/labeler.yaml/.json or a workflow that references actions/labeler, but the evidence field only lists .github/labeler.yml. Update evidence (and/or the failure reason) so the report accurately reflects all accepted configuration paths.

        const found = await hasAutoLabeler(context.repoPath);
        return {
          status: found ? "pass" : "fail",
          reason: found
            ? undefined
            : "No PR auto-labeler configured (.github/labeler.yml or actions/labeler workflow). Auto-labeling routes PRs to the right reviewers without manual triage.",
          evidence: [".github/labeler.yml"]
        };

Copilot · 2026-03-24T00:22:46Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

+async function hasIssueTemplates(repoPath: string): Promise<boolean> {
+  const single = await fileExists(path.join(repoPath, ".github", "ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md"));
+  if (single) return true;
+  const dir = path.join(repoPath, ".github", "ISSUE_TEMPLATE");
+  try {
+    const entries = await fs.readdir(dir);
+    return entries.some((e) => /\.(md|yml|yaml)$/iu.test(e));
+  } catch {
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+async function hasCommitConvention(repoPath: string): Promise<boolean> {
+  const configs = [
+    ".commitlintrc",
+    ".commitlintrc.json",
+    ".commitlintrc.yml",
+    ".commitlintrc.yaml",
+    ".commitlintrc.js",
+    ".commitlintrc.cjs",
+    ".commitlintrc.mjs",
+    ".commitlintrc.ts",
+    "commitlint.config.js",
+    "commitlint.config.cjs",
+    "commitlint.config.mjs",
+    "commitlint.config.ts",
+    ".cz-config.js",
+    ".czrc"
+  ];
+  for (const config of configs) {
+    if (await fileExists(path.join(repoPath, config))) return true;
+  }
+  const pkg = await readJson(path.join(repoPath, "package.json"));
+  if (pkg) {
+    const allDeps = {
+      ...((pkg.dependencies as Record<string, unknown>) ?? {}),
+      ...((pkg.devDependencies as Record<string, unknown>) ?? {})
+    };
+    if (
+      Object.keys(allDeps).some(
+        (dep) => dep.startsWith("@commitlint/") || dep === "commitlint" || dep === "commitizen"
+      )
+    ) {
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+async function hasReleaseAutomation(
+  repoPath: string
+): Promise<{ found: boolean; evidence: string[] }> {
+  const evidence: string[] = [];
+  const configs = [
+    "release.config.js",
+    "release.config.cjs",
+    "release.config.mjs",
+    "release.config.ts",
+    ".releaserc",
+    ".releaserc.json",
+    ".releaserc.yml",
+    ".releaserc.yaml",
+    ".releaserc.js",
+    ".releaserc.cjs",
+    ".changeset/config.json",
+    "release-please-config.json"
+  ];
+  for (const config of configs) {
+    if (await fileExists(path.join(repoPath, config))) {
+      evidence.push(config);
+    }
+  }
+  const workflowsDir = path.join(repoPath, ".github", "workflows");
+  try {
+    const workflows = await fs.readdir(workflowsDir);
+    for (const workflow of workflows) {
+      if (!/\.ya?ml$/iu.test(workflow)) continue;
+      try {
+        const content = await fs.readFile(path.join(workflowsDir, workflow), "utf8");
+        if (
+          content.includes("semantic-release") ||
+          content.includes("changesets/action") ||
+          content.includes("googleapis/release-please-action")
+        ) {
+          evidence.push(`.github/workflows/${workflow}`);
+        }
+      } catch {
+        // skip unreadable workflow
+      }
+    }
+  } catch {
+    // no workflows directory
+  }
+  return { found: evidence.length > 0, evidence };
+}
+
+async function hasAutoLabeler(repoPath: string): Promise<boolean> {
+  for (const file of [".github/labeler.yml", ".github/labeler.yaml", ".github/labeler.json"]) {
+    if (await fileExists(path.join(repoPath, file))) return true;
+  }
+  const workflowsDir = path.join(repoPath, ".github", "workflows");
+  try {
+    const workflows = await fs.readdir(workflowsDir);
+    for (const workflow of workflows) {
+      if (!/\.ya?ml$/iu.test(workflow)) continue;
+      try {
+        const content = await fs.readFile(path.join(workflowsDir, workflow), "utf8");
+        if (content.includes("actions/labeler")) return true;
+      } catch {
+        // skip unreadable workflow
+      }
+    }
+  } catch {
+    // no workflows directory
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+async function hasBranchRulesets(repoPath: string): Promise<boolean> {
+  const rulesetsDir = path.join(repoPath, ".github", "rulesets");
+  if (await fileExists(rulesetsDir)) {
+    try {
+      const entries = await fs.readdir(rulesetsDir);
+      if (entries.some((e) => e.endsWith(".json"))) return true;
+    } catch {
+      // skip unreadable directory
+    }
+  }
+  return fileExists(path.join(repoPath, ".github", "branch-protection.json"));
+}


These new helper functions (hasIssueTemplates, hasCommitConvention, hasReleaseAutomation, hasAutoLabeler, hasBranchRulesets) duplicate logic that also exists in packages/core/src/services/readiness/checkers.ts. Keeping two copies increases the chance they drift; consider extracting them into a single shared module and reusing it from both the monolithic and modular readiness implementations.

Copilot · 2026-03-24T00:22:46Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts

+              "Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",
+            evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md"]


The PR template criterion’s failure message/evidence only points to .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, but hasPullRequestTemplate() also accepts templates in .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/. Update the reason/evidence (and optionally the content-quality check) so the report reflects both supported locations.

This issue also appears on line 545 of the same file.

Suggested change

"Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",

evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md"]

"Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",

evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md", ".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/"]

Copilot · 2026-03-24T00:22:46Z

packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

+              "Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",
+            evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md"]


The PR template criterion’s failure message/evidence only points to .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, but hasPullRequestTemplate() also considers templates in .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/. This mismatch can mislead users into thinking they must use the single file even when a directory template is supported; update the reason/evidence (and optionally the content-quality check) to account for both locations.

This issue also appears on line 944 of the same file.

Suggested change

"Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",

evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md"]

"Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",

evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md", ".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/"]

…d validation

rbmathis added 3 commits March 23, 2026 15:23

content massage

04252e1

feat: update documentation for workflow automation readiness pillar a…

c7a5ee8

…nd adjust references to 10 pillars

rbmathis requested review from digitarald and pierceboggan as code owners March 23, 2026 21:24

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 23, 2026 21:24

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of rbmathis March 23, 2026 21:25 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Mar 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

Update packages/core/src/services/readiness/criteria.ts

621ec12

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 23, 2026 21:31

Update packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts

1414609

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of rbmathis March 23, 2026 21:32 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Mar 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

rbmathis marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2026 00:09

rbmathis added 2 commits March 23, 2026 19:13

fix: remove unnecessary BOM characters and improve documentation clar…

9002e7a

…ity across multiple files

Merge branch 'feat/workflow-automation-pillar' of https://github.com/…

878145d

…MSBart2/agentrc into feat/workflow-automation-pillar

rbmathis requested a review from Copilot March 24, 2026 00:17

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of rbmathis March 24, 2026 00:18 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Mar 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

feat: enhance PR template checks and update related tests for improve…

9621241

…d validation

rbmathis closed this Mar 24, 2026

	# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card
	# AgentRC: The Agentic SDLC Report Card

		@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
		# SDLC Readiness Assessment: Toward Level-5 Agentic Delivery

	const hasLinkedIssue = /fixes\s+#\|closes\s+#\|resolves\s+#/iu.test(content);
	const hasLinkedIssue = /\b(?:fixes\|closes\|resolves)\s+#/iu.test(content);

		@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
		# AgentRC — Product Brief
		# AgentRC — Product Brief

		@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
		# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup
		# AgentRC — AI Repository Setup

		"Missing PR template (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). A template with linked-issue and testing sections standardises agent-generated PR descriptions.",
		evidence: [".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md"]

Conversation

rbmathis commented Mar 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rbmathis Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rbmathis commented Mar 23, 2026

Uh oh!

rbmathis commented Mar 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects