docs: mark codegen-quality PRD as completed

[david-waltermire]

Summary

Updates the PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/ PRD documentation to reflect all planned work is complete:

• PR 1 (feat: enhance code generator Javadoc and null-safety annotations #577): Code generator Javadoc improvements and null-safety annotations
• PR 2 (feat: add collection class override support in binding configuration #584): Collection class override support in binding configuration
• PR 3: Databind bootstrap infrastructure (combined with PR 2)
• PR 4 (feat(databind): add parser validation for required fields and collection types #593): Parser required field validation with type compatibility checks
• PR 5: Choice instance support for annotation-based bindings (addressed by PR 4 using typed collections)

Changes

• Updates PRD.md status from "In Progress" to "Completed"
• Marks all acceptance criteria as complete in verification checklist
• Updates implementation-plan.md with final PR statuses
• Moves PRD from "Active PRDs" to "Completed PRDs" in CLAUDE.md

Test plan

• Documentation updates only - no code changes
• All referenced PRs have been merged to develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Completed code generation quality improvements initiative, including collection class override support, enhanced field validation, and choice instance support for bindings.
  • Updated project documentation to reflect all planned work items are now finished.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates to mark a code generation quality PRD (PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/) as completed, consolidating status across CLAUDE.md, PRD.md, and implementation-plan.md files. Multiple related PRs are now documented as completed with references to actual work PRs (#584, #593).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
PRD Status Tracking CLAUDE.md	Relocated PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/ entry from "Active PRDs" to "Completed PRDs" table with completion date 2025-12-28.
PRD Documentation PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md	Updated header status from "In Progress" to "Completed"; updated Last Updated date to 2025-12-28. Marked PRs 2–5 as completed with summaries. Updated verification checklist with all items checked as complete.
Implementation Plan PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/implementation-plan.md	Changed PR 5 status from "Pending" to "Completed" with files noted as "(included in PR 4)" and consolidated into PR 593. Updated acceptance criteria and added closing note "All planned work completed."

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• metaschema-framework/metaschema-java#576 — Adds the PRD and implementation-plan files for PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality that are being marked as completed in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• aj-stein

Poem

🐰 A PRD hops to completion today,
With five PRs now marking the way,
Collection classes and choice bindings fixed,
Validation and bindings all mixed,
The work is complete—hip hooray! 📋✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: marking a completed PRD as finished in the documentation.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 572a125 and 6faaa6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• CLAUDE.md
• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md
• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/implementation-plan.md

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (5)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: CR
Repo: metaschema-framework/metaschema-java PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-17T13:27:43.679Z
Learning: For larger initiatives requiring multiple PRs, use structured PRD (Product Requirements Document) approach. PRDs stored in PRDs/<YYYYMMDD>-<name>/ with PRD.md and implementation-plan.md. Target ≤50 files per PR, maximum 100 files per PR.

📚 Learning: 2025-12-17T13:27:43.679Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: metaschema-framework/metaschema-java PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-17T13:27:43.679Z
Learning: For larger initiatives requiring multiple PRs, use structured PRD (Product Requirements Document) approach. PRDs stored in PRDs/<YYYYMMDD>-<name>/ with PRD.md and implementation-plan.md. Target ≤50 files per PR, maximum 100 files per PR.

Applied to files:

• CLAUDE.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T21:21:40.208Z

Learnt from: david-waltermire
Repo: metaschema-framework/metaschema-java PR: 567
File: metaschema-testing/src/main/java/gov/nist/csrc/ns/metaschema/test_suite/_1_0/Metaschema.java:41-47
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T21:21:40.208Z
Learning: In metaschema-framework/metaschema-java, generated binding classes in package gov.nist.csrc.ns.metaschema.test_suite._1_0 (and similar generated binding packages) are pre-generated by metaschema-maven-plugin and checked into source control. Javadoc coverage issues in these generated classes should be tracked as code generator improvements rather than file-level issues, and improvements are deferred to generator enhancements.

Applied to files:

• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md
• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/implementation-plan.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-24T21:21:56.361Z

Learnt from: david-waltermire
Repo: metaschema-framework/metaschema-java PR: 567
File: metaschema-testing/src/main/java/gov/nist/secauto/metaschema/model/testing/testsuite/Metaschema.java:41-47
Timestamp: 2025-12-24T21:21:56.361Z
Learning: In metaschema-testing, generated binding classes under gov.nist.secauto.metaschema.model.testing.testsuite are produced by metaschema-maven-plugin from YAML metaschema definitions. Javadoc issues in these generated classes should not be flagged for manual fixes; improvements are tracked and handled through code generator enhancements rather than manual edits to the generated source.

Applied to files:

• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-17T13:27:43.679Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: metaschema-framework/metaschema-java PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-17T13:27:43.679Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.java : All code changes must follow the Javadoc style guide (docs/javadoc-style-guide.md). New code requires 100% Javadoc coverage on public/protected members. Modified code must add/update Javadoc on any members touched. All Javadoc must include param, return, throws tags in the correct order (BLOCKING)

Applied to files:

• PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Code
• GitHub Check: Website

🔇 Additional comments (7)

CLAUDE.md (1)

299-299: Proper implementation of PRD completion tracking.

The entry is correctly moved from "Active PRDs" to "Completed PRDs" with the completion date, following the documented process in lines 285-287.

PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/implementation-plan.md (3)

312-322: Consolidation rationale clearly documented.

PR 5 is correctly marked as completed via PR #593, with the consolidation approach (typed collections vs. separate @BoundChoice annotation) well-explained in lines 381-387. The table format and file count notation "(included in PR 4)" accurately reflect the merged work.

---

381-387: Excellent consolidation note explaining design tradeoff.

The note at lines 381-387 clearly explains why the separate @BoundChoice annotation was avoided in favor of leveraging existing choice group infrastructure with typed collections. This improves maintainability by reducing annotation surface area.

---

399-402: Accurate completion summary.

The summary correctly reflects:

• 5 planned PRs consolidated into 3 actual PRs executed
• Both consolidations explicitly noted: PRs 2+3, PRs 4+5
• Clear closure: "All planned work completed."

PRDs/20251224-codegen-quality/PRD.md (3)

8-8: Metadata updated correctly.

Status changed to "Completed" and Last Updated date set to 2025-12-28, matching the PR creation date and consistent across all tracked documents.

Also applies to: 11-11

---

139-173: All PR sections properly completed with status and PR references.

Each PR now includes explicit "Status: Completed" line with corresponding GitHub PR numbers:

• PR 1: #577
• PR 2: #584
• PR 3: Combined with PR 2 in [feat: add collection class override support in binding configuration #584]
• PR 4: #593
• PR 5: Addressed by [feat(databind): add parser validation for required fields and collection types #593] via typed collections

The consolidation narrative (PRs 2+3 and 4+5) is clear and consistent with implementation-plan.md.

---

189-198: Verification checklist comprehensively completed.

All 10 acceptance criteria are marked complete [x], covering:

• Javadoc generation (no extraneous quotes, constructor/accessor tags)
• Null-safety annotations
• Checkstyle compliance
• Databind bootstrap regeneration
• Required field validation at parse time
• Collection class type compatibility
• Choice instance support

The checklist aligns well with work described in implementation-plan.md and confirms all planned deliverables are verified.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}