use nanomorph & bel 5 #71
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch makes it so
yo-yoandchoostay compatible, and it becomes trivial to switch one out for the other. We switched tonanomorphwhenmorphdomintroduced several regressions in a minor version bump, introduced a tooling requirement and started adding features that pushed it beyond just dom diffing. So farnanomorphhas been quite alright, and I reckon it would make sense to keep the behavior the same (: Semver major for sure tho ✌️Changes
morphdomwithnanomorphbel@5Notable changes
nanomorph, so no more custom logic inyo-yo<input>elements must have avalue=${myValue}attribute set when copying, rather than the value from the old node being persisted. This way the DOM truly becomes a function of the data, rather than having parts of it that need clearing logic.onload()no longer ships inbel@5nanomorphdoesn't have a plugin system