Conversation
|
@esoteric-ephemera looks great to me! Did you think about a way to benchmark if there is indeed an advantage timewise, e.g. when executing in jobflow only. I think it will simplify execution with jobflow-remote! |
|
I can try to throw together a quick benchmark. Any concerns about the change in output documents? Not sure how much you've been using #1196 to do calculations, but this would change how the outputs are structured (here: a list of TaskDocument vs. 1196: TaskDocument having a list of structures/energies/etc.) |
|
We haven't used it much since the PR. There were some plans initially but we stopped this a while back. As long as the phonon workflow runs, I am happy. |
|
My hope is that we might build a thermal conductivity workflow in the future. Here, the batch mode might be really useful as well. |
Possibly supersedes #1196. Tagging @naik-aakash and @JaGeo for thoughts.
The goal here is to make smaller structural changes overall to the jobs/workflows and ensure that each calculation maps to one output document
Changes:
AseRelaxMakerand thusForceFieldRelaxMaker/ForceFieldStaticMakerTaskDocuments are returned