Skip to content

Implement semver validation for manifest version#28

Open
leynos wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/implement-netsuke_version-parsing-and-validation
Open

Implement semver validation for manifest version#28
leynos wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/implement-netsuke_version-parsing-and-validation

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary

  • validate netsuke_version using semver::Version
  • update design notes about semantic version validation
  • tick roadmap item for the manifest version
  • update example manifests to use 1.0.0
  • add unit and behavioural tests for invalid versions

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68800bd49a508322af89553d36827559

Summary by Sourcery

Enforce semantic versioning on the manifest’s version field, update related documentation and examples, and expand tests for invalid version handling

New Features:

  • Validate netsuke_version using semver::Version to enforce proper SemVer strings

Enhancements:

  • Revise example manifests to use version "1.0.0"

Documentation:

  • Update design notes to describe SemVer validation and correct code fence formatting
  • Mark the SemVer manifest version task complete in the roadmap

Tests:

  • Add unit test for invalid manifest version deserialization
  • Add behavioral test scenario and step definitions for manifest parsing failures and error message assertions

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

PR enhances manifest version handling by deserializing netsuke_version into a semver::Version, causing invalid version strings to fail at parse time, and updates documentation, tests, and examples to reflect and verify this change.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Implement semantic version validation for manifest version
  • Deserialize netsuke_version into semver::Version to enforce SemVer rules
  • Ensure manifests with invalid version strings fail to load
  • Add fixture invalid_version.yml for negative testing
tests/data/invalid_version.yml
Add unit and behavior tests for invalid versions
  • Introduce unit test in ast_tests.rs to assert failure on bad version
  • Add Cucumber steps for manifest parsing failure and error message checks
  • Expand feature manifest.feature with an invalid-version scenario
tests/ast_tests.rs
tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs
tests/features/manifest.feature
Update documentation on semantic version validation and code fences
  • Revise design notes to describe semver::Version usage in netsuke-design.md
  • Mark the manifest version item as done in docs/roadmap.md
  • Correct Markdown code fence formatting in design and Cucumber docs
docs/netsuke-design.md
docs/roadmap.md
docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
Bump example manifests to valid SemVer strings
  • Change netsuke_version from "1.0" to "1.0.0" in all examples
examples/basic_c.yml
examples/photo_edit.yml
examples/visual_design.yml
examples/website.yml
examples/writing.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Improved formatting and clarity in multiple documentation files, including consistent code block delimiters and clearer explanations regarding manifest version parsing.
    • Updated the project roadmap to mark manifest version parsing as completed.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Standardised version strings in example configuration files from "1.0" to "1.0.0" for consistency and validity.
  • Tests

    • Added new unit and feature tests to ensure invalid manifest versions are correctly rejected.
    • Introduced new test data and Cucumber step definitions to verify error handling and messaging for manifest version validation.

Walkthrough

Update documentation and example YAML files to standardise netsuke_version to "1.0.0" and clarify version parsing details. Add new tests to ensure manifests with invalid version strings are rejected, including feature tests, step definitions, and supporting test data. Correct markdown formatting and indentation in documentation.

Changes

Files/Group Change Summary
docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md Correct indentation of a URL in a footnote reference.
docs/netsuke-design.md Fix code block delimiters; reword manifest version parsing paragraph for clarity.
docs/roadmap.md Mark checklist item for version parsing as complete.
examples/*.yml Update netsuke_version value from "1.0" to "1.0.0" in all example manifests.
tests/ast_tests.rs Add unit test for deserialising a manifest with invalid version string.
tests/data/invalid_version.yml Add test data manifest with invalid netsuke_version: "1.0".
tests/features/manifest.feature Add scenario for invalid manifest version parsing and error assertion.
tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs Add Cucumber step definitions to check for manifest parsing failure and error message content.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TestRunner
    participant ManifestParser
    participant ErrorHandler

    TestRunner->>ManifestParser: Parse manifest with netsuke_version: "1.0"
    ManifestParser-->>ErrorHandler: Detect invalid version string
    ErrorHandler-->>TestRunner: Return error message containing "version"
    TestRunner->>TestRunner: Assert parsing failed and error message contains "version"
Loading

Estimated code review effort

2 (~12 minutes)

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix citation footnotes #21: Adjusts indentation of a URL in a footnote reference within the same documentation file, showing a related focus on formatting.
  • Restore missing footnotes #27: Restores and adds missing footnotes in the same documentation file, indicating related changes to footnote content and structure.

Suggested reviewers

  • codescene-delta-analysis

Poem

Versions aligned, the tests now sing,
Markdown neat, a tidy thing.
"1.0" is gone, "1.0.0" is here,
Invalid manifests now disappear!
With steps and checks both crisp and clear,
This tidy patch brings order near.
🦀✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/implement-netsuke_version-parsing-and-validation

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21e1558 and 57fbe38.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/netsuke-design.md (4 hunks)
  • docs/roadmap.md (1 hunks)
  • examples/basic_c.yml (1 hunks)
  • examples/photo_edit.yml (1 hunks)
  • examples/visual_design.yml (1 hunks)
  • examples/website.yml (1 hunks)
  • examples/writing.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/ast_tests.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/invalid_version.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/features/manifest.feature (1 hunks)
  • tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs (1 hunks)
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

docs/**/*.md: Use the markdown files within the docs/ directory as a knowledge base and source of truth for project requirements, dependency choices, and architectural decisions.
Proactively update the relevant file(s) in the docs/ directory to reflect the latest state when new decisions are made, requirements change, libraries are added/removed, or architectural patterns evolve.
Documentation must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar (with the exception of 'license' which is to be left unchanged for community consistency).

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md
**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.md: Validate Markdown files using make markdownlint.
Run make fmt after any documentation changes to format all Markdown files and fix table markup.
Validate Mermaid diagrams in Markdown files by running make nixie.
Markdown paragraphs and bullet points must be wrapped at 80 columns.
Code blocks in Markdown must be wrapped at 120 columns.
Tables and headings in Markdown must not be wrapped.
Use dashes (-) for list bullets in Markdown.
Use GitHub-flavoured Markdown footnotes ([^1]) for references.

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.md: * Avoid 2nd person or 1st person pronouns ("I", "you", "we")

  • Use en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar
  • Paragraphs and bullets must be wrapped to 80 columns, except where a long URL would prevent this (in which case, silence MD013 for that line)
  • Code blocks should be wrapped to 120 columns.
  • Headings must not be wrapped.
  • Documents must start with a level 1 heading
  • Headings must correctly increase or decrease by no more than one level at a time
  • Use GitHub-flavoured Markdown style for footnotes and endnotes.
  • Numbered footnotes must be numbered by order of appearance in the document.

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
  • tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
  • tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs
**/*{_test,tests}.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*{_test,tests}.rs: Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Use rstest fixtures for shared setup.
Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.
Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

docs/**/*.md: Use the markdown files within the docs/ directory as a knowledge base and source of truth for project requirements, dependency choices, and architectural decisions.
Proactively update the relevant file(s) in the docs/ directory to reflect the latest state when new decisions are made, requirements change, libraries are added/removed, or architectural patterns evolve.
Documentation must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar (with the exception of 'license' which is to be left unchanged for community consistency).

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md
**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.md: Validate Markdown files using make markdownlint.
Run make fmt after any documentation changes to format all Markdown files and fix table markup.
Validate Mermaid diagrams in Markdown files by running make nixie.
Markdown paragraphs and bullet points must be wrapped at 80 columns.
Code blocks in Markdown must be wrapped at 120 columns.
Tables and headings in Markdown must not be wrapped.
Use dashes (-) for list bullets in Markdown.
Use GitHub-flavoured Markdown footnotes ([^1]) for references.

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.md: * Avoid 2nd person or 1st person pronouns ("I", "you", "we")

  • Use en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar
  • Paragraphs and bullets must be wrapped to 80 columns, except where a long URL would prevent this (in which case, silence MD013 for that line)
  • Code blocks should be wrapped to 120 columns.
  • Headings must not be wrapped.
  • Documents must start with a level 1 heading
  • Headings must correctly increase or decrease by no more than one level at a time
  • Use GitHub-flavoured Markdown style for footnotes and endnotes.
  • Numbered footnotes must be numbered by order of appearance in the document.

Files:

  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md
  • docs/netsuke-design.md
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
  • tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
  • tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs
**/*{_test,tests}.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*{_test,tests}.rs: Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Use rstest fixtures for shared setup.
Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.
Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

Files:

  • tests/ast_tests.rs
🔇 Additional comments (16)
examples/basic_c.yml (1)

1-1: Maintain semver-compliant manifest version; change is correct.

"1.0.0" satisfies semantic-version parsing while remaining quoted to avoid YAML numeric coercion. No further action required.

examples/website.yml (1)

1-1: Keep version string in full semver form.

The update to "1.0.0" aligns the sample manifest with the new validation logic. Good work.

examples/writing.yml (1)

1-1: Version field updated to valid semver.

Change is correct and consistent with other examples.

tests/data/invalid_version.yml (1)

1-6: Test fixture correctly captures invalid version.

The manifest intentionally uses "1.0" to trigger validation failure in tests. File structure is minimal yet sufficient.

examples/visual_design.yml (1)

1-1: Semantic versioning compliance correctly implemented.

The update from "1.0" to "1.0.0" aligns with the semver crate validation requirements and maintains consistency across example manifests.

examples/photo_edit.yml (1)

1-1: Consistent semantic versioning update applied.

The version string correctly updated to "1.0.0" to comply with semver validation requirements.

docs/roadmap.md (1)

27-28: Roadmap accurately updated to reflect completed implementation.

The checklist item correctly marked as complete with proper formatting and annotation style consistent with other completed items.

tests/ast_tests.rs (1)

217-221: Well-implemented unit test for version validation.

The test correctly validates that invalid semantic version strings cause deserialization to fail. The test name is descriptive and the implementation is concise and focused.

tests/features/manifest.feature (1)

8-11: Comprehensive integration test scenario for version validation.

The Cucumber scenario properly tests both the failure condition and error message content, providing valuable integration-level coverage that complements the unit tests. The Gherkin syntax is correct and the scenario is well-structured.

docs/netsuke-design.md (5)

406-410: LGTM! Code block delimiter corrected.

The change from quadruple to triple backticks properly formats the Rust code block for correct syntax highlighting and rendering.


490-491: LGTM! Consistent code block formatting maintained.

The correction ensures proper markdown syntax for the Rust code example.


553-554: LGTM! YAML code block delimiter corrected.

The formatting fix ensures proper syntax highlighting for the YAML example.


590-594: Excellent clarification of semver parsing implementation.

The addition clearly explains how netsuke_version validation works using the semver::Version library's Deserialize implementation. This provides users with a clear understanding of the strict semantic versioning requirement and failure behaviour.


1004-1012: LGTM! Ninja code block formatting corrected.

The fixes ensure proper markdown syntax for the Ninja build file examples, maintaining consistent formatting throughout the documentation.

tests/steps/manifest_steps.rs (2)

58-62: Well-implemented failure validation step.

The function properly validates both aspects of parsing failure: the absence of a successfully parsed manifest and the presence of an error message. The assertion messages are clear and helpful for debugging test failures.


64-72: Excellent error message validation step.

The function properly implements error message content checking with appropriate Clippy suppression, clear expectations, and a helpful assertion message that shows both actual and expected content. The implementation follows established testing patterns in the codebase.

Comment on lines 1168 to +1169
July 2025 —
<https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
<https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Fix inconsistent footnote indentation.

Keep footnote URLs indented uniformly at four spaces to match the rest of the document and avoid visual drift.

-       <https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
+    <https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
July 2025 —
<https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
<https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
July 2025 —
<https://docs.rs/cucumber/latest/cucumber/struct.Cucumber.html>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/behavioural-testing-in-rust-with-cucumber.md around lines 1168 to 1169,
the footnote URL indentation is inconsistent. Adjust the indentation of the
footnote URL line to be uniformly four spaces, matching the rest of the
document's footnote style to maintain visual consistency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant