Skip to content

Conversation

@hortison
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Yi Nuo <218099172+yi-nuo426@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 22, 2026 05:36
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request upgrades the @meshery/schemas package from version 0.8.118 to 0.8.122. The upgrade involves updating both the devDependency declaration and the lock file. The new version of the schemas package also includes updated peer dependencies with more lenient React version requirements (downgraded from ^18.3.1 to ^17.0.2).

Changes:

  • Updated @meshery/schemas from ^0.8.118 to ^0.8.122 in devDependencies
  • Updated package-lock.json with new version, integrity hash, and peer dependency requirements

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
package.json Updated @meshery/schemas version in devDependencies from ^0.8.118 to ^0.8.122
package-lock.json Updated resolved version, integrity hash, and peer dependencies for @meshery/schemas (React peer dependency changed from ^18.3.1 to ^17.0.2)

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

"@eslint/eslintrc": "^3.3.1",
"@eslint/js": "^9.39.2",
"@meshery/schemas": "^0.8.118",
"@meshery/schemas": "^0.8.122",
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The @meshery/schemas version in devDependencies has been updated to ^0.8.122, but the peerDependencies at line 88 still references the old version ^0.8.118. Both should be updated to the same version to ensure consistency and avoid potential dependency resolution issues.

Suggested change
"@meshery/schemas": "^0.8.122",
"@meshery/schemas": "^0.8.118",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants