-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Bump add addlicense check in Makefile #96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dongjiang1989 <dongjiang1989@126.com>
集成 addlicense 工具并更新依赖变更概述
变更文件
💡 小贴士与 lingma-agents 交流的方式📜 直接回复评论
📜 在代码行处标记
📜 在讨论中提问
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces addlicense to automate the addition of license headers to Go files. The changes include updating the Makefile to add a new addlicense target, adding the tool dependency to go.mod, and applying the license to a couple of test files.
My review has found a couple of issues in the Makefile:
- A critical issue where the
addlicensetool will fail to install because it's missing fromscripts/tools.go. - A high-severity issue with unquoted glob patterns in the
addlicensecommand, which will cause it to not function as intended.
Please address these points to ensure the new license check works correctly.
| SWAGGO_BINARY=$(TOOLS_BIN_DIR)/swag | ||
| TOOLING=$(GOLANGCILINTER_BINARY) $(GOSEC_BINARY) $(GOSYCLO_BINARY) $(SWAGGO_BINARY) | ||
| ADDLICENSE_BINARY=$(TOOLS_BIN_DIR)/addlicense | ||
| TOOLING=$(GOLANGCILINTER_BINARY) $(GOSEC_BINARY) $(GOSYCLO_BINARY) $(SWAGGO_BINARY) $(ADDLICENSE_BINARY) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addlicense binary is added to the TOOLING variable, but the installation mechanism for tools is missing the entry for addlicense. The $(TOOLING) target parses scripts/tools.go to install binaries, but github.com/google/addlicense has not been added to that file. This will cause make addlicense or make all to fail because the addlicense binary cannot be installed. Please add _ "github.com/google/addlicense" to scripts/tools.go to fix this.
Makefile
Outdated
|
|
||
| .PHONY: addlicense | ||
| addlicense: $(ADDLICENSE_BINARY) # addlicense | ||
| $(ADDLICENSE_BINARY) -f scripts/boilerplate.txt -ignore $(shell pwd)/vendor/**/* **/*.go |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The glob patterns for -ignore and the file matching are not quoted. This can lead to the shell expanding them incorrectly, especially **/*.go which requires globstar to be enabled for recursive matching. To ensure addlicense receives the patterns correctly, they should be quoted.
Additionally, addlicense is usually run from the project root, so using $(shell pwd) to create an absolute path is likely unnecessary; a relative path vendor/**/* should work. Furthermore, addlicense ignores vendor directories by default, so the -ignore flag might be redundant.
$(ADDLICENSE_BINARY) -f scripts/boilerplate.txt -ignore 'vendor/**/*' '**/*.go'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔎 代码评审报告
🎯 评审意见概览
| 严重度 | 数量 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Blocker | 0 | 阻断性问题,需立即修复。例如:系统崩溃、关键功能不可用或严重安全漏洞。 |
| 🟠 Critical | 0 | 严重问题,高优先级修复。例如:核心功能异常或性能瓶颈影响用户体验。 |
| 🟡 Major | 1 | 主要问题,建议修复。例如:非核心功能缺陷或代码维护性较差。 |
| 🟢 Minor | 1 | 次要问题,酬情优化。例如:代码格式不规范或注释缺失。 |
总计: 2 个问题
📋 评审意见详情
💡 代码实现建议
以下是文件级别的代码建议,聚焦于代码的可读性、可维护性和潜在问题。
📄 Makefile (2 💬)
🚀 架构设计建议
以下是对代码架构和设计的综合分析,聚焦于跨文件交互、系统一致性和潜在优化空间。
🔍1. 许可证检查工具集成缺乏统一配置管理
当前在Makefile中直接硬编码了addlicense的执行路径和忽略规则,这可能导致在不同环境或项目结构变化时维护困难。建议将这些配置参数提取到单独的配置文件或通过环境变量进行管理,以提高可维护性和灵活性。
📌 关键代码
$(ADDLICENSE_BINARY) -f scripts/boilerplate.txt -ignore $(shell pwd)/vendor/**/* **/*.go
未来如果需要调整忽略规则或者更换模板文件位置,必须手动修改Makefile,增加了维护成本和出错风险。
🔍2. 新增依赖可能引入间接安全风险
虽然addlicense本身是一个用于添加许可证头的工具,但其引入的新依赖(如doublestar/v4)可能会带来未知的安全隐患。应定期审查新引入依赖项的安全状态,并确保有机制监控第三方库的安全更新。
📌 关键代码
github.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4 v4.0.2 // indirect
未及时发现并修复依赖中的安全漏洞,可能导致整个项目的供应链安全性降低。
🔍3. 测试覆盖率策略需明确与自动化
目前仅在两个测试文件中添加了许可证头部信息,但没有看到对所有Go源码文件自动应用相同标准的机制。应当建立一个全面且自动化的流程来保证所有代码文件都符合版权要求,避免遗漏。
📌 关键代码
// Copyright 2024 The KubeService-Stack Authors.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0...// Copyright 2024 The KubeService-Stack Authors.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0...部分代码文件缺少必要的许可证声明,可能违反开源协议规定,影响项目的合规性。
审查详情
📒 文件清单 (6 个文件)
✅ 新增: 1 个文件
📝 变更: 5 个文件
✅ 新增文件:
scripts/boilerplate.txt
📝 变更文件:
Makefilepkg/metrics/metrics_test.gopkg/middleware/metrics_test.goscripts/go.modscripts/go.sum
💡 小贴士
与 lingma-agents 交流的方式
📜 直接回复评论
直接回复本条评论,lingma-agents 将自动处理您的请求。例如:
-
在当前代码中添加详细的注释说明。
-
请详细介绍一下你说的 LRU 改造方案,并使用伪代码加以说明。
📜 在代码行处标记
在文件的特定位置创建评论并 @lingma-agents。例如:
-
@lingma-agents 分析这个方法的性能瓶颈并提供优化建议。
-
@lingma-agents 对这个方法生成优化代码。
📜 在讨论中提问
在任何讨论中 @lingma-agents 来获取帮助。例如:
-
@lingma-agents 请总结上述讨论并提出解决方案。
-
@lingma-agents 请根据讨论内容生成优化代码。
| GOSYCLO_BINARY=$(TOOLS_BIN_DIR)/gocyclo | ||
| SWAGGO_BINARY=$(TOOLS_BIN_DIR)/swag | ||
| TOOLING=$(GOLANGCILINTER_BINARY) $(GOSEC_BINARY) $(GOSYCLO_BINARY) $(SWAGGO_BINARY) | ||
| ADDLICENSE_BINARY=$(TOOLS_BIN_DIR)/addlicense |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
应更新工具变量以包含新添加的addlicense二进制文件。
🟢 Minor | 🧹 Code Smells
📋 问题详情
在Makefile中,TOOLING变量未包含新增的ADDLICENSE_BINARY,这可能导致依赖管理不完整或构建过程中遗漏该工具。为确保所有工具都被正确引用和使用,应当将ADDLICENSE_BINARY加入到TOOLING变量中。
💡 解决方案
将ADDLICENSE_BINARY添加到TOOLING变量中以确保它被包含在内。
- TOOLING=$(GOLANGCILINTER_BINARY) $(GOSEC_BINARY) $(GOSYCLO_BINARY) $(SWAGGO_BINARY)
+ TOOLING=$(GOLANGCILINTER_BINARY) $(GOSEC_BINARY) $(GOSYCLO_BINARY) $(SWAGGO_BINARY) $(ADDLICENSE_BINARY)您的反馈对我们很重要!(建议右键在新标签页中打开以下链接)
|
|
||
| .PHONY: all | ||
| all: swag format test build e2e # format test build e2e type. | ||
| all: swag addlicense format test build e2e # format test build e2e type. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
应在all目标中调用addlicense任务以执行许可证检查。
🟡 Major | 🧹 Code Smells
📋 问题详情
当前all目标没有调用addlicense任务,这意味着在运行完整构建流程时不会自动进行许可证检查。为了保证代码合规性,在all目标中应该包含对addlicense的调用。
💡 解决方案
在all目标中增加addlicense以确保其被执行。
- all: swag format test build e2e # format test build e2e type.
+ all: swag addlicense format test build e2e # format test build e2e type.🔧 建议代码
[!NOTE]
AI 生成代码 - 请在应用前检查逻辑、规范并测试
| all: swag addlicense format test build e2e # format test build e2e type. | |
| all: swag addlicense format test build e2e # format test build e2e type. |
您的反馈对我们很重要!(建议右键在新标签页中打开以下链接)
Signed-off-by: dongjiang1989 <dongjiang1989@126.com>
No description provided.