-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
model weights and config modification #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| data_type: float32 | ||
| data_range: [-inf, inf] | ||
| halo: [0, 0, 32, 48, 48] | ||
| halo: [0, 32, 48, 48] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is really so much of the returned output affected by edge artefacts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is based on the settings in Pytorch-3DUNet, which worked well for Kinetochores use case (training as well as inference). But do you suggest to go for smaller values? (I can try that)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could this be the halo within the network? You have your slicer, etc. to go over the whole volume. Just make sure that this is actually specifying the final output and not an intermediate step within your algorithm. If that's the case leave it as is and let's get this working before we start tweaking things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my understanding was that as this slicer is only used within your model it has no direct influence over the overall in- and output of the whole bioimage.io model. Let's take a closer look at this when we have a more or less running example.
No description provided.