Skip to content

Conversation

@DCchoudhury15
Copy link

Changes

  • Fixed a bug where the Operator ignored the namespace field when using the structured local-gateways configuration format.
  • Updated UpdateNamespace logic in ingress_service.go to unmarshal and prioritize the plural local-gateways YAML array.
  • Added unit tests in ingress_service_test.go to verify structured config parsing and ensure it takes precedence over legacy dot-notation config.

/kind bug

Fixes #2201

Release Note

Fixed an issue where the Knative Operator ignored the namespace field in the structured local-gateways configuration, defaulting incorrectly to istio-system.

Signed-off-by: DCchoudhury15 <divyanshuchoudhury3@gmail.com>
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jan 9, 2026
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Welcome @DCchoudhury15! It looks like this is your first PR to knative/operator 🎉

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 9, 2026
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Hi @DCchoudhury15. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jan 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DCchoudhury15
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dsimansk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from houshengbo and matzew January 9, 2026 13:37
@DCchoudhury15
Copy link
Author

@houshengbo i have created the pr up for review.

@houshengbo
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 13, 2026
@DCchoudhury15
Copy link
Author

@houshengbo all tests have passed waiting for approval

}

// UpdateNamespace set correct namespace of istio to the service knative-local-gateway
func UpdateNamespace(u *unstructured.Unstructured, data map[string]string, ns string) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This func can be refactored a bit for better logical separation:

var (
	knativeLocalGateway = "knative-local-gateway"
	localGateways = "local-gateways"
)

func UpdateNamespace(u *unstructured.Unstructured, data map[string]string, namespace string) {
	if ns := resolveGatewayNamespace(data, namespace); ns != "" {
		u.SetNamespace(ns)
	}
}

func resolveGatewayNamespace(data map[string]string, ns string) string {
	if ns := fromStructuredGateways(data); ns != "" {
		return ns
	}

	return fromLegacyGateway(data, ns)
}

func fromStructuredGateways(data map[string]string) string {
	raw, ok := data[localGateways]
	if !ok {
		return ""
	}

	var gateways []localGatewayConfig
	if err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(raw), &gateways); err != nil {
		return ""
	}

	for _, gw := range gateways {
		if gw.Name == knativeLocalGateway {
			return gw.Namespace
		}
	}

	return ""
}

func fromLegacyGateway(data map[string]string, ns string) string {
	key := fmt.Sprintf("local-gateway.%s.%s", ns, knativeLocalGateway)

	raw, ok := data[key]
	if !ok {
		return ""
	}

	fields := strings.Split(raw, ".")
	if len(fields) < 2 {
		return ""
	}

	return fields[1]
}

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.44%. Comparing base (a8c6cf4) to head (a2cc6bb).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2217      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.31%   63.44%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        1878     1885       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1189     1196       +7     
  Misses        597      597              
  Partials       92       92              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Co-authored-by: Vincent <shou73@bloomberg.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Operator ignores namespace field in structured local-gateways config (service is always created in istio-system)

2 participants