-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: export types in mod #112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve restructuring type exports in the project. The Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-139: Review data exposure in type definitionsThe type definitions include potentially sensitive information such as test results, browser configurations, and URLs. While these are just type definitions, ensure that:
- The actual runtime data using these types is properly sanitized before logging
- Error messages don't leak sensitive information
- Test results don't expose internal infrastructure details
Consider adding documentation comments to mark sensitive fields and provide usage guidelines for implementers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
mod.ts(1 hunks)src/types.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- mod.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/types.ts (1)
165-165: Verify the usage of imported types across the codebase
Let's ensure that no code is attempting to use these type objects at runtime, which could lead to unexpected behavior.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have failed due to specific path patterns. Let's try a broader search to understand how these types are being used, including checking the mod.ts file that was mentioned in the summary.
No runtime usage of type objects detected - safe to proceed
The verification shows that the types are being used appropriately:
- The types are only imported for TypeScript type checking (from
./types.tsin various files) - No runtime access of properties on the
typesobject was found - The only direct usage is in
mod.tswhich re-exports the types, maintaining the module's public API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any runtime usage of the types object
rg -l "types\.[A-Z]" --type ts
# Search for import patterns to understand how these types are being consumed
rg "from ['\"].*types['\"]" --type ts
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for types usage
# First, let's find all files that import from types
rg "import.*from.*['\"].*types['\"]" --type ts -A 2
# Also search for direct usage of 'types'
rg "\btypes\b" --type ts -A 2
# Let's also check the mod.ts file mentioned in the summary
fd "mod.ts" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 1194
This is an automated pull request for branch develop
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
typesobject that aggregates various type definitions for improved organization and accessibility.Bug Fixes
ServiceCaseParamstotypesfor consistency and clarity.