Skip to content

Updates for get_feature_ids(), get_features()#7

Open
kkellerlbl wants to merge 20 commits into
kbaseattic:developfrom
kkellerlbl:develop
Open

Updates for get_feature_ids(), get_features()#7
kkellerlbl wants to merge 20 commits into
kbaseattic:developfrom
kkellerlbl:develop

Conversation

@kkellerlbl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Updates for changes to data_api get_feature_ids() and get_features(). This PR points to my fork of data_api for Travis builds; that should be updated when the PR for data_api gets merged.

Added LWP::Protocol::https to require list
Added Getopt support to bin/ scripts; changed default url to ci (though I'm not sure that's good)
Modified travis.yml to explicitly state url for calling bin scripts
Support for get_feature_ids() to return lists of tuples instead of lists of feature_ids
  (filter by region not working yet)
Support for get_features() to accept a list of tuples instead of a list of ids
Change default service endpoint back to localhost:9103
Changed default service endpoint to localhost:9101
@kkellerlbl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Please do not merge yet, I think there's one more thing that's causing Travis to fail.

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Current coverage is 94.73%

Merging #7 into develop will decrease coverage by -4.34% as of 726ba5d

@@            develop      #7   diff @@
=======================================
  Files             3       3       
  Stmts           108     133    +25
  Branches          0       0       
  Methods           0       0       
=======================================
+ Hit             107     126    +19
  Partial           0       0       
- Missed            1       7     +6

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 726ba5d

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@kkellerlbl kkellerlbl changed the title [WIP] Updates for get_feature_ids(), get_features() Updates for get_feature_ids(), get_features() Jan 5, 2016
@kkellerlbl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Tests are now passing again, so I think this is safe to merge. I will wait a little in case people want to review it first.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that the get_feature_ids() code is still compatible for when PR 133 is rejected.

@kkellerlbl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I think that the remaining incompatible changes in this PR are to the Thrift specs, which can just be regenerated. It looks like the rest of the changes are still okay.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants