Index HTML page #39
Open
Index HTML page #39
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@ntdb works for me fine. Great improvement! |
|
👍 |
Repository owner
deleted a comment from
Regradingmelissa
Sep 18, 2017
|
The index file is the first file I looked for. Think this would be very valuable for navigating between offline issues! |
|
@ntdb rebased your PR - had to squash your commits: https://github.com/zaidan/offline-issues/tree/add/index-page |
|
I'd love to see this issue not frozen in time. Are people using another workaround for now? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an index page to the HTML output and links on each issue to return to the index page. Multiple repositories work just fine, though with few frills.
This includes some pretty significant changes to the
writehtml.jsfile to parse the comments in a more robust manner. I think the added processing time will be offset by not running thewriteIssuesloop for duplicated comments.Let me know what you think!
References: #3, #18