Skip to content

Conversation

@JulianFun123
Copy link
Member

@JulianFun123 JulianFun123 commented Feb 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined DOM interactions with enhanced event handling and element processing for a smoother integration.
    • Simplified state update logic to ensure consistent notifications during state changes.
  • Chores
    • Updated publishing commands to optimize the package release process for improved efficiency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request refactors how control flows and events are handled in two packages and updates the publishing script. In the PulsDOMAdapter, the controlFlows property is now a simple one-dimensional boolean array, and several methods have been adjusted—most notably, key comparisons and event dispatch parameters have been streamlined. In the Hook class, conditional checks have been removed to ensure that listener dispatch occurs unconditionally during value updates, and the disabled tracking flag is no longer set. The publish script now omits the recursive flag during publishing.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
puls-dom-adapter/.../PulsDOMAdapter.ts - Changed controlFlows type from boolean[][] to boolean[]
- Modified the placeholder transformer's test to check only for null and adjusted the create function syntax
- Updated setAttribute to compare keys without a colon (from ':else-if' to 'else-if') and require event keys to start with @.
- Altered event dispatch in replaceElement and replaceElements
- Simplified addPart call and updated render to call addParts
puls-state/.../Hook.ts - Removed conditional checks in the setValue method (including the guard for a destroyed state and the dispatch flag), ensuring that dispatchListener(old) is always called
- In disableTracking, removed the command that set the tracking flag to false
publish.sh - Removed the -r flag from the pnpm publish command, thereby shifting from recursive publishing to non-recursive publishing

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as Client
    participant DOMAdapter as PulsDOMAdapter
    participant Renderer as addParts
    Client->>DOMAdapter: render()
    DOMAdapter->>Renderer: call addParts(...)
    Renderer-->>DOMAdapter: return parts
    DOMAdapter-->>Client: return rendered nodes
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller as Caller
    participant Hook as Hook Instance
    participant Listener as Listener
    Caller->>Hook: setValue(newValue)
    Hook->>Listener: dispatchListener(oldValue)
Loading

Poem

I’m a rabbit in the code garden, hopping with glee,
Arrays now flow simpler, as clear as can be.
Conditions removed, events sing with delight,
Each updated method brings the code shining bright.
With wiggling ears and paws so keen,
I celebrate these changes in our bug-free scene! 🐰

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 319d0b3 and bb60e63.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts (9 hunks)
  • packages/puls-state/src/Hook.ts (2 hunks)
  • publish.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts

[error] 163-163: Expected a function body, or an expression but instead found 'return'.

Expected a function body, or an expression here.

(parse)


[error] 163-163: expected : but instead found [

Remove [

(parse)

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)
packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts

[failure] 163-163:
'{' expected.


[failure] 163-163:
Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests
packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts

[error] 163-163: TS2695: Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects.


[error] 164-164: TS2552: Cannot find name 'set'. Did you mean 'Set'?


[error] 164-164: TS7006: Parameter 'el' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[error] 165-165: TS2353: Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'as' does not exist in type 'ValueTransformer'.


[error] 165-165: TS18004: No value exists in scope for the shorthand property 'as'. Either declare one or provide an initializer.


[error] 203-203: TS2345: Argument of type 'any[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'boolean'.


[error] 212-212: TS2339: Property 'includes' does not exist on type 'boolean'.


[error] 213-213: TS2339: Property 'push' does not exist on type 'boolean'.


[error] 223-223: TS2339: Property 'includes' does not exist on type 'boolean'.


[error] 446-446: TS2551: Property 'addParts' does not exist on type 'PulsDOMAdapter'. Did you mean 'addPart'?


[error] 163-163: TS1005: '{' expected.


[error] 164-164: TS1005: ';' expected.


[error] 165-165: TS1005: ',' expected.


[error] 165-165: TS1005: ',' expected.


[error] 165-165: TS1005: '(' expected.


[error] 166-166: TS1136: Property assignment expected.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Test the build process
packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts

[error] 163-163: error TS1005: '{' expected.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/puls-state/src/Hook.ts (1)

35-35: LGTM! Simplified listener dispatch logic.

The change makes the behavior more predictable by always dispatching listeners when a value is set.

publish.sh (1)

2-2:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify the impact of removing recursive publish.

The -r flag has been removed from the publish command. This means packages won't be published recursively, which could affect the publishing process for dependent packages.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for package dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.workspaces'

Length of output: 80


Action Required: Manually verify multirepo configuration impact.

The shell script failed to locate a root-level package.json, suggesting the repository may not be structured as a standard single-package project. If you are using workspaces (e.g., via a pnpm-workspace.yaml file) to manage multiple packages, the removal of the -r flag could prevent dependent packages from being published.

Please verify that:

  • Your project employs a monorepo/workspace setup (check for a pnpm-workspace.yaml or similar configuration).
  • Recursive publishing is required to update all dependent packages.

Based on your findings, update the publish command if necessary to ensure all packages are published as intended.

e.removeEventListener(':dettach', handleDetach);
e.removeEventListener(':attach', handleAttach);
(to as ChildNode[]).forEach((innerEl): void => {
if (!from.includes(innerEl)) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in event name.

There's a typo in the event name dettach which should be detach.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-                    e.removeEventListener(':dettach', handleDetach);
+                    e.removeEventListener(':detach', handleDetach);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
e.removeEventListener(':dettach', handleDetach);
e.removeEventListener(':detach', handleDetach);

Comment on lines +162 to 164
test: (value: any) => value === null,
create: (value: any) => return [this.document.createComment('placeholder')],
set: (el, value: any) => {}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error in placeholder transformer.

The create function has incorrect syntax and is causing build failures.

Apply this diff to fix the syntax:

-            create: (value: any) => return [this.document.createComment('placeholder')],
+            create: (value: any) => {
+                return [this.document.createComment('placeholder')]
+            },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test: (value: any) => value === null,
create: (value: any) => return [this.document.createComment('placeholder')],
set: (el, value: any) => {}
test: (value: any) => value === null,
create: (value: any) => {
return [this.document.createComment('placeholder')]
},
set: (el, value: any) => {}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 163-163: Expected a function body, or an expression but instead found 'return'.

Expected a function body, or an expression here.

(parse)


[error] 163-163: expected : but instead found [

Remove [

(parse)

🪛 GitHub Check: build (20)

[failure] 163-163:
'{' expected.


[failure] 164-164:
';' expected.


[failure] 163-163:
Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects.


[failure] 164-164:
Cannot find name 'set'. Did you mean 'Set'?


[failure] 164-164:
Parameter 'el' implicitly has an 'any' type.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests

[error] 163-163: TS2695: Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects.


[error] 164-164: TS2552: Cannot find name 'set'. Did you mean 'Set'?


[error] 164-164: TS7006: Parameter 'el' implicitly has an 'any' type.


[error] 163-163: TS1005: '{' expected.


[error] 164-164: TS1005: ';' expected.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Test the build process

[error] 163-163: error TS1005: '{' expected.

if (key === ':if' || key === 'else-if' || key === ':else') {
return this.setConditionFlowAttribute(key, value, parserTag)
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix condition check for else-if.

The condition check for else-if is missing the colon prefix.

Apply this diff to fix the condition:

-        if (key === ':if' || key === 'else-if' || key === ':else') {
+        if (key === ':if' || key === ':else-if' || key === ':else') {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (key === ':if' || key === 'else-if' || key === ':else') {
if (key === ':if' || key === ':else-if' || key === ':else') {

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix method name mismatch.

The method addParts doesn't exist. The correct method name is addPart.

Apply this diff to fix the method name:

-        return this.parsed.map(p => this.addParts(p)).flat().filter(c => c)
+        return this.parsed.map(p => this.addPart(p)).flat().filter(c => c)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
return this.parsed.map(p => this.addParts(p)).flat().filter(c => c)
return this.parsed.map(p => this.addPart(p)).flat().filter(c => c)
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests

[error] 446-446: TS2551: Property 'addParts' does not exist on type 'PulsDOMAdapter'. Did you mean 'addPart'?


export class PulsDOMAdapter extends PulsAdapter<Node[]>{
controlFlows: boolean[][] = []
controlFlows: boolean[] = []
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify the control flow type change.

The controlFlows property type has been changed from boolean[][] to boolean[]. This change affects the logic in setConditionFlowAttribute method where array operations are performed.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of controlFlows array operations
rg -A 5 'controlFlows\[.*\]' packages/puls-dom-adapter/src/PulsDOMAdapter.ts

Length of output: 886


Critical: Revisit controlFlows Type Change Logic

After verifying the usage of controlFlows in PulsDOMAdapter.ts, it appears that the change from boolean[][] to boolean[] is causing a type mismatch. The method setConditionFlowAttribute continues to use array operations on this.controlFlows[this.currentControlFlow] (i.e., calling .includes(true) and .push(value)), which implies that each element of controlFlows is expected to be an array rather than a simple boolean value.

  • Action: Either revert the type change back to boolean[][] or update the logic in setConditionFlowAttribute (and any related methods) to correctly handle a one-dimensional array if that is the intended behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants