Skip to content

Conversation

@gfournierPro
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 18, 2025 08:57
@gfournierPro gfournierPro changed the title Fix: update sepolia owner fix: update sepolia owner Dec 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Arbitrum Sepolia testnet configuration to use a new owner/deployer address and adds documentation for new features in the v6.2.0 upgrade.

  • Updates the Arbitrum Sepolia configuration (chain ID 421614) to use address 0x87bdca5F82cD5B138cD12a724d6c0eC7e3114dA6 for deployer, owner, and richman roles
  • Adds documentation for cross-framework TEE compatibility and single-transaction deposit/match order features to the v6.2.0 upgrade notes

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
config/config.json Updates deployer, owner, and richman addresses for Arbitrum Sepolia testnet configuration from 0x9990cfb1Feb7f47297F54bef4d4EbeDf6c5463a3 to 0x87bdca5F82cD5B138cD12a724d6c0eC7e3114dA6
scripts/upgrades/v6.2.0.md Adds a "New Features" section documenting cross-framework TEE compatibility (#325) and atomic deposit/match orders functionality (#316)

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +26 to +30
### New Features

- **Cross-framework TEE compatibility (#325)**: Ignore TEE framework bits (Scone, Gramine, TDX) in dataset tags during order matching. This allows existing dataset orders with SGX tags (e.g., Scone `0b0011`) to be consumed on TDX workerpools (`0b1001`), enabling cross-framework compatibility.

- **Deposit and match orders in a single transaction (#316)**: Users can now call `RLC.approveAndCall()` to deposit tokens and execute `matchOrders` atomically in a single transaction. This improves UX by reducing the number of transactions required to create a deal.
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of "New Features" section appears to be unrelated to the PR title "Fix: update sepolia owner". This documentation change describes cross-framework TEE compatibility and deposit/match orders functionality, which are separate features from updating the owner address. Consider moving these documentation changes to a separate PR focused on documenting these features, or update the PR title to reflect that this PR includes both the owner update and feature documentation.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (3b0db05) to head (5a00ccf).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #335   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        1137     1137           
  Branches      228      228           
=======================================
  Hits         1096     1096           
  Misses         41       41           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gfournierPro gfournierPro merged commit 16f30e3 into main Dec 18, 2025
6 checks passed
@gfournierPro gfournierPro deleted the fix/update-sepolia-owner branch December 18, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants