-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Add Support for JSON Schema Draft-04 Keywords #130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@jdesrosiers please have a look whenever you're free,because i feel a lot of it needs to be re iterated over |
jdesrosiers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a quick review. I didn't have enough time to look over everything in much detail.
Make sure you're working with @Adityakumar37 on the items/additionalItems keywords. I'm hoping to merge that PR first, then you can rebase and add the rest of the draft-04 implementation on top of that.
Anyway, your approach for those keywords isn't right. Those are simple applicators. Simple applicators don't need error handlers. Your normalization handlers should look a lot like the keywords from draft-2020-12 that serve the same purpose.
dependencies is a weird one because it's a simple applicator in some cases (schemas) and a validation keyword in other cases (string array). It can even do both at the same time. I need to go through that handler closer later, but it seems like it should be a problem.
|
hey @jdesrosiers , |
jdesrosiers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks pretty close now. The only thing I haven't looked at yet is the tests.
80282d2 to
c0a8983
Compare
|
hey @jdesrosiers |
We want to merge #131 first, so let's keep this in draft until that's merged. Other than that, yes. I'll review now, but I think it's mostly ready with exception of that one part. |
jdesrosiers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a couple more comments in the dependencies error handler. I also took a look at the tests this time. I skipped the items/additionalItems tests because I expect those to come from the other PR, but the rest of the tests look good enough.
jdesrosiers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good except for a little cleanup.
|
The draft-2019-09 PR has been merged. I've marked this as ready for review. Please rebase and resolve conflicts. |
- Add normalization handlers - Add error handlers - Fix type handling and numeric count/matchCount constraints - Update draft-04 test suite
feat(draft-04): add support for JSON Schema Draft-04 keywords - Add normalization handlers - Add error handlers - Fix type handling and numeric count/matchCount constraints - Update draft-04 test suite A fix normalization and error handlers Signed-off-by: Diya <diyasrivastava2023@gmail.com> fix: normalization and error handlers for draft-04 fix type checks revert minimum and maximum error handler
Signed-off-by: Diya <diyasrivastava2023@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Diya <diyasrivastava2023@gmail.com>
3e9b1f1 to
bca1110
Compare
Added Support for JSON Schema Draft-04 Keywords
I have implemented full support for the requested Draft-04 keywords in
@hyperjump/json-schema-errors.Issue : #119
Changes made
itemsandadditionalItemsDraft-04 treats
itemsandadditionalItemsas siblings whereadditionalItemsvalidation depends onitems(ifitemsis an array).itemsnormalization handler in items.js.itemshandler infers the URI of the siblingadditionalItemskeyword (by string manipulation of theitemsURI) and retrieves the schema from the AST. It then acts as the validator for the "tail" items that fall underadditionalItemscriteria.dependenciesImplemented
dependencies.jsto handle both:Numeric Keywords (
maximum,minimum)Implemented handlers
maximum.js,minimum.js.exclusiveMaximum(boolean).exclusiveMaximum) to construct the correct error message ("less than" vs "less than or equal to").Also Added test cases