Skip to content

fix: address race condition#1500

Open
aseering wants to merge 3 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
aseering:bug/race-condition
Open

fix: address race condition#1500
aseering wants to merge 3 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
aseering:bug/race-condition

Conversation

@aseering
Copy link

@aseering aseering commented Feb 24, 2026

Implements the double-check lock pattern for inline-begin-transaction.

@aseering aseering requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2026 18:02
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: s Pull request size is small. label Feb 24, 2026
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/python-spanner API. label Feb 24, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @aseering, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential race condition in the Google Cloud Spanner client library where multiple threads could concurrently attempt to initialize a transaction ID. By introducing a double-check locking pattern, the changes ensure that the _transaction_id is safely and correctly initialized only once, thereby improving the robustness and thread-safety of transaction management within the library.

Highlights

  • Race Condition Fix: Implemented a double-check locking mechanism to prevent race conditions during the initialization of _transaction_id in key methods, ensuring thread safety.
Changelog
  • google/cloud/spanner_v1/snapshot.py
    • Added a double-check locking pattern within the _get_streamed_result_set method to safely handle _transaction_id initialization.
  • google/cloud/spanner_v1/transaction.py
    • Applied a double-check locking pattern to the execute_update method for thread-safe _transaction_id initialization.
    • Incorporated a double-check locking pattern into the batch_update method to prevent race conditions during _transaction_id setup.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a race condition in transaction creation by implementing a double-checked locking pattern across several methods. The logic is sound. I have one suggestion for google/cloud/spanner_v1/snapshot.py to remove a redundant line of code, which will improve clarity and align the implementation with the other changes in this PR.

@olavloite olavloite changed the title bug(spanner): Address race condition fix: address race condition Feb 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/python-spanner API. size: s Pull request size is small.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants