Skip to content

Conversation

@gmickel
Copy link
Owner

@gmickel gmickel commented Jan 23, 2026

Summary\n- port /flow-next:prime skill + scouts + remediation templates\n- add /flow-next:prime command + README updates, bump version/changelog\n- update Ralph receipts enforcement + auto-close unscoped epics\n- document unscoped epic auto-close\n\n## Testing\n- not run (docs/skills/ralph changes only)

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gmickel gmickel merged commit 8bc2c16 into main Jan 23, 2026
4 checks passed
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 09aebe8db6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +1018 to +1022
# Receipt is structurally valid - now check the verdict
if [[ "$receipt_verdict" == "NEEDS_WORK" ]]; then
# Task marked done but review said NEEDS_WORK - must retry
echo "ralph: receipt verdict is NEEDS_WORK; resetting task to todo" >> "$iter_log"
log "task $task_id: receipt verdict=NEEDS_WORK despite done status; resetting"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Treat MAJOR_RETHINK verdicts as blocking in Ralph

When an impl review receipt contains MAJOR_RETHINK and the task is already marked done, this block only retries on NEEDS_WORK and otherwise proceeds as successful. That contradicts the documented behavior in docs/ralph.md (“Review Loops Until SHIP” and MAJOR_RETHINK blocks progress), so a MAJOR_RETHINK verdict can still advance the run. Consider handling MAJOR_RETHINK the same way as NEEDS_WORK (reset to todo or abort) to prevent accepting fundamentally flawed work.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants