Skip to content

Conversation

@nickrolfe
Copy link
Contributor

@nickrolfe nickrolfe commented Jul 3, 2025

Since the tree-sitter-based extractors use * IDs for locations, they are not shared between a base database and an overlay, so we need to add discard_entity predicates to discard locations from the base in files that got re-extracted in the overlay.

@nickrolfe nickrolfe added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Jul 3, 2025
@nickrolfe nickrolfe force-pushed the nickrolfe/overlay-deleted-files branch from b6d49dc to 2ac7bf8 Compare July 3, 2025 11:32
@nickrolfe nickrolfe force-pushed the nickrolfe/rb-discard-locations branch from cacc1c9 to 3a0c7bc Compare July 3, 2025 11:34
@nickrolfe nickrolfe force-pushed the nickrolfe/overlay-deleted-files branch from 2ac7bf8 to d8574a6 Compare July 3, 2025 11:44
@nickrolfe nickrolfe force-pushed the nickrolfe/rb-discard-locations branch from 3a0c7bc to 281d5cd Compare July 3, 2025 11:52
Base automatically changed from nickrolfe/overlay-deleted-files to main July 4, 2025 15:10
@nickrolfe nickrolfe force-pushed the nickrolfe/rb-discard-locations branch from 281d5cd to 7c5b186 Compare July 4, 2025 15:15
@nickrolfe nickrolfe marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2025 15:17
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 4, 2025 15:17
@nickrolfe nickrolfe requested review from a team as code owners July 4, 2025 15:17
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@nickrolfe nickrolfe merged commit eb30233 into main Jul 7, 2025
56 checks passed
@nickrolfe nickrolfe deleted the nickrolfe/rb-discard-locations branch July 7, 2025 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note QL-for-QL Ruby

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants