Skip to content

Conversation

@michaelnebel
Copy link
Contributor

…ameworks.

@michaelnebel michaelnebel marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 08:55
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 13, 2025 08:55
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

@michaelnebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coadaflorin : We are ready to claim full support for C# 13 / .NET 9. That is, we support extracting all new language constructs for C# 13 and QL library and data flow support has been implemented.
Should we also include a change note that states this?

@coadaflorin
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelnebel Yes! That is a good suggestion. We should make sure we differentiate it from the 2.20.1 entry which said:
The C# extractor now supports basic extraction of .NET 9 projects. There might be limited support for extraction of code using the new C# 13 language features.

@michaelnebel michaelnebel requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 09:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C# label Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coadaflorin coadaflorin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️ SHIP IT!

@michaelnebel michaelnebel merged commit 50584c8 into github:main Feb 13, 2025
18 checks passed
@michaelnebel michaelnebel deleted the csharp/updatedocumentation branch February 13, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants