TreeSitter extractors: log fewer lines #18713
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Printing a line for every extracted file is too verbose and for large projects makes it impossible to view the log in the Actions UI.
hvitved
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Contributor
hvitved
left a comment
hvitved
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will the line still be added to the extractor log?
Contributor
Author
I don't think so, unless the log writer uses a higher log level. The line should still be added when a workflow is re-run in debug mode. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Printing a line for every extracted file is too verbose and for large projects makes it impossible to view the log in the Actions UI.