Fix #11721 Add support for line traces classification #11733
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…into feat/add-line-classification
…at/add-line-classification
2 tasks
allyoucanmap
changed the title
…at/add-line-classification
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds the classification mode for the line chart so that the line traces can be categorized for the visualization.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
Currently, the line trace only supports line, line+marker, and scatter type charts.
#11721
What is the new behavior?
The line traces type will have classification style in dropdown and after it is selected the line traces will be categorized according to the classification attribute field selected.
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information