Skip to content

Conversation

@hebelsan
Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan commented Dec 4, 2025

How to categorize this PR?

/area quality
/kind enhancement
/platform openstack

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR ensures that the PR validation runs with the actual code instead of master.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #335

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Fix pull request handling for PRs of fork owners outside of the gardener organisation

@hebelsan hebelsan requested review from a team as code owners December 4, 2025 13:16
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 4, 2025
push:
branches:
- 'master'
- 'release-*'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since our release branches are named rel-*

Suggested change
- 'release-*'
- 'rel-*'

secrets: inherit # access to `GitHub-Actions`-App is needed to read teams
uses: gardener/cc-utils/.github/workflows/pullrequest-trust-helper.yaml@master
with:
trusted-teams: 'core,mcm-maintainers,gardener-extension-provider-openstack-maintainers'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need core to be mentioned here since they're not the team reviewing PRs on this repo?

@gardener-ci-robot
Copy link

The Gardener project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 15d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 15d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 7d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close

/lifecycle stale

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs/review Needs review platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adapt Build/Linting pipeline to avoid unlinted code on main/master

4 participants