Skip to content

Conversation

@gapcomputer
Copy link
Owner

@gapcomputer gapcomputer commented May 23, 2025

Setup Comprehensive Jest Testing Framework for MailGeek Chrome Extension

Description

Task

Install and Configure Jest Testing Framework

Acceptance Criteria

  • Jest is successfully installed as a dev dependency
  • package.json contains a 'test' script that runs Jest
  • Jest configuration file exists with basic Chrome extension settings
  • Running 'npm test' does not throw any errors

Summary of Work

Overview

This pull request introduces a robust Jest testing framework to the MailGeek Chrome Extension, establishing a comprehensive testing infrastructure for unit testing and code quality assurance.

Changes Implemented

  • Installed Jest testing framework as a dev dependency
  • Created Jest configuration file (jest.config.js)
  • Added Jest setup file (jest.setup.js) with Chrome API mocks
  • Configured package.json with test scripts
  • Created initial test suites for popup.js and content.js
  • Set up test coverage reporting

Implementation Details

1. Jest Configuration

  • Used jsdom test environment for browser-like testing
  • Configured coverage collection for popup.js and content.js
  • Added setup files for test initialization
  • Created separate test scripts for different testing modes

2. Test Setup

  • Implemented mock Chrome API to simulate extension environment
  • Created mock functions to test core extension components
  • Configured test files to handle component-specific scenarios

3. Testing Approach

  • Unit testing for individual module functions
  • Mocking Chrome extension APIs
  • Coverage reporting to track test completeness
  • Flexible test scripts (test, watch, coverage)

Testing Results

  • All initial test suites pass successfully
  • Basic test coverage established
  • Preparatory infrastructure for future comprehensive testing

Acceptance Criteria Met

  • ✅ Jest framework installed
  • ✅ Configuration files created
  • ✅ Initial test suites implemented
  • ✅ Test scripts configured
  • ✅ Chrome API mocked for testing

Notes

  • Further refinement of tests will be needed as extension evolves
  • Recommend expanding test coverage in future iterations
  • Some mocking may require updates based on actual implementation details

Next Steps

  • Add more granular unit tests
  • Increase test coverage
  • Integrate with CI/CD pipeline

Changes Made

  • Installed Jest testing framework
  • Created Jest configuration file
  • Added Jest setup file
  • Configured package.json test scripts
  • Created initial test suites for popup.js and content.js
  • Set up test coverage reporting

Tests

  • Verify Jest installation
  • Confirm test configuration setup
  • Run initial test suites
  • Check test coverage reporting

Signatures

Staking Key

GaAX5SsXwQtnAZpYuM8xiQy6jT6y45ZwceSDM44YmRDC: 8AFvFabEtYBGPT3bg16NGUic3RFxnMqy82ytGjeoFsx1jRnvrmhSbfM4LUrBYQEBpLTovhz8mJjJUbPFjY79RNBqWEEvEpUi42v5uD7dSYL4pximkUXCxkSGfi1SQKKzqAAy4mk6LwhD2xw3Ce3PPJhDU4Fesn56vKu66757m7EqFfaTw6vi1UkUdJU4G6KRJWb4gsiFDSAFKpWqhY7XA6PyfVJaV3ZHxoSBjWZSyLKuB6LsZ1we7fngTHZJ3D9uDfm6JxQCJDEcvpPCAWbYM2aHFt9ybvrfzzLvjCWWiY2xqSuJZJdzUyxBSTn51e5E4EirNHuxiqdhiF25ehbZhKW9fM4vAtUGLjFS7RK1x3oTxnRDmiLiX38AJAKmMmA5BJiBzqZgH9kh1vaYLzT3YNwDtXyDNAsSAm4TW

Public Key

HUqT8zPGT5GXD98yLtdhg35nBeSMJgZoHW26vXQkDe7o: 9NpjFntyqcQr3cDRfzMuJwSc4qCEooWJV8J4ZTtcwhsR5GZCgWBZpxVgoatC1i2kFLHGavTT8x2E4UosNEywXetWBieA4r7V1ik5tenXtwT7cgMmFq9mx8eW2hdCYmXDK3wfB5KZiS7j1f7vsurVcSi98Big7HBQ4XAfbNYJJtPFhGSstNJpLQ7egL7dnhoNHFXQLNKn1borenGkHxE3VGR7ZEdN9qjBGNVaEw5n9xXr14GtgZtd56JtRKq3WjC9ox1RtR4FJbJQZxBYjfuYyWpruRE5DRBCBwABR2jG5r1xxdc29qGLgoNU6ZxoTFoHJ6M2DVhrXyV198jPauyeW9EDnVgRNE9spiUzeuJRfsEazfJSofB7rba4MUgiTKNFGCkx7DDkv9xWB3n2q1oaJNTmd8CS6bAaXt4Fn

@gapcomputer gapcomputer changed the title [WIP] Setup Jest Testing Framework for MailGeek Chrome Extension Setup Comprehensive Jest Testing Framework for MailGeek Chrome Extension May 23, 2025
@gapcomputer gapcomputer marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2025 05:54
@Santix1234
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of the MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests exist but lack comprehensive coverage
  • Code is spread across multiple files instead of being centralized
  • Minimal error handling and edge case testing

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive edge case testing
  • Thorough error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests

Action Items

  • Consolidate implementation into /src directory
  • Move tests to /tests directory
  • Improve test coverage for edge cases
  • Add more robust error handling tests
  • Implement performance and resource usage tests

Signatures

Staking Key

DKCEYXWcoJrRVt9kB7nXZQkeL2MrNxobmbsWC8R3QWA8: N9KFW6TfN72joNaF7wbXCxxRmeesL9AGx9WLuQWSNEu6pQipiPJaNHkuRip6MiCaiSv4YFfrmkSNdLi2f6q7VS34GNz4S4FDAWVVbg6kNxuKofUWR77dsdJeYu8f79aPmNV5CuDt4m5yShs6NJ5jCmtHatfZD7kWSF3G2msGhdhLwpJ3Ui7XMesgEBjX3ib8mwhHYjeuyJs6hMuKNvYWQDsLF75Sx7oJiKd4kFUrfknERfLtbitJhBKYba74JPy8BrpKbq5yjPS

Public Key

BLkTvPfFXvR52AK1EoHFaPyE1eDy6Mr5GvgWAbFMvK6x: 9tF7jnLRji4LUJmJMXfci3UrG2fwysxvmYdUuhVkFuMNWmCvqccwm4y5ChgweBSugjQnWkEMFLi8jwrqWmo9JEpvJQWmJMSbQ7QYNo4ptPx5UmHzyj8n8uTYMeGE85dNKq8UWHe3Wznw6iGBxk5BdB4RtcYRtntSs8vaDeubX2AEp9GR3kpYNLexmBj2KWrFpvxbHoxSjp88MRqm5pMVZSvnpke8tsFRCBPN77KWKhXkgsxNpDibdoPbX8HEqNef6YQTzNge24Lk

@Vuk7912
Copy link

Vuk7912 commented May 23, 2025

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests are present but not optimally structured
  • Implementation exists but not in the recommended directory
  • Some basic functionality is tested, but test coverage could be improved

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in /src directory
  • Tests are not in /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance tests
  • Input validation tests

Action Items

  • Move implementation files to /src directory
  • Move test files to /tests directory
  • Enhance test coverage for error handling
  • Add input validation tests
  • Add performance and resource usage tests

Signatures

Staking Key

3oBzgQ4y8YtmkxYGkse1fKKefi25twpMKU9BBdsYtjDQ: FjEDfLvmXAdvqeox8y2K7k65HUrJr4oHjFsvi5v9yRbwA9h4ArD9mop7b8dY5pJ31cN4bXXstRsZDrPRKjk3VD4Yt7aFBQkact1983bZpzsPCLiwsoEdva46zdgfudD4zCj1nvmLBJBoo6mzSJrsXYoRUC5nypXEAoytueqmUcsBBEoy7nCoMamDpa8VYatbMWpv3GSTCE4JQgwFypvFQrJx3uEFJv92vTyNJ3jQQrVxQfu4K2GjXo2Cq8vVZ6gPVXTMw73wE2dA

Public Key

4WA5vRJLthsg6sJqVc6DQuRkGzvoxZ11SkqzwbqxCo2V: D2Ef2RJ34DvkZYfdhADL5ytexxavy3CLmVSyBBCHXt5RgiQEnijNp2X8A2bS5kNEaRSNHsrxaqBruD1YR5Y34GFAZpxPFaTtCP7x97LaeSM6Wd356pNNqtoqVvjR6wGnQV3NrjtFUKgiSupBGRk3e55BRB55B24Fhd6ZYbQoKx37aFxpiDvawgocsSX3vRhtesWQwGDj1t7297Pot729ktRSEghSfFeLDU3BBEr1pZdJjWJLWXEJZDby7HHe211qww7BgggvM3AU

@Merango
Copy link

Merango commented May 23, 2025

MailGeek Chrome Extension Implementation Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and test coverage

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests pass technically but lack comprehensive coverage
  • File structure does not match specified requirements
  • Existing tests are primarily mocks, not full implementation tests

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive edge case testing
  • Thorough error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests

Action Items

  • Move implementation files to /src directory
  • Move test files to /tests directory
  • Enhance test coverage to include edge cases and error scenarios
  • Add performance and resource usage tests
  • Improve error handling and input validation in tests
  • Remove hardcoded credentials and improve security

Signatures

Staking Key

Gkn3eRUR8rbiHgjXYmXWKgBQnGQWEhJk1n9rvecfFxTm: FCufX6u3VaikMHhpDzApStLwH7h7qU5tPBvXSDAaEAbwgwyeES8uchZJdNnVgzxxjnhQkGS71wLqBMCbnkXwPcksHgfRvt6EJi2vduShgxm7df7zH1svNhUhRnLsjJnUxTLcWugyVsKaPnQZjUZabqcX3yy1zg2tZSAWLTrgmuxbuRQYsHy6r4FXq8AEr8TuBfQgDBe5JRiZAX18iiV4qM6DppP6cRtEBfSHMNoasy2bZeFBWzimGGm18Eq43qqSPAoQ3TQMmpNY

Public Key

Gq6qy4e4ja8P8iQiawFZvBSYYd62G4X2swAb5rr2axvw: 2eR8ETdqRhJzQtDP7eTQtkby4ssDoeXRnftux7WKFYFqLfvJGddpNDgWGKtZxJHsBgRPxNkixM12m5a95L7fsEn9yNeKem4MVPxpQjcds6rtBHX7nKp62AFdCv95VjfXaT11htbxvAFGpDdDNr5GstGbDvhcjsCSRoNgbiYLV78gFDXbzP7q8so4B3KQneWVXdMuy9yUA7KUt6oPSa5zb9NwB4Db24cMJLui7Eq2cW2BZL6XoYx7WH1kRYVbTpz6TxMmy1e1kJAx

@gapcomputer
Copy link
Owner Author

MailGeek Chrome Extension Implementation

Description

Chrome extension for email tracking and management with content and popup scripts.

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests exist but do not fully cover the implementation's complexity
  • File structure does not match specified requirements
  • Test files contain mock-based tests that don't validate actual implementation

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests
  • Edge case input validation tests

Action Items

  • Reorganize files to have implementation in /src and tests in /tests
  • Enhance test coverage to include more comprehensive validation
  • Add explicit error handling and input validation tests
  • Remove hardcoded credentials and sensitive information
  • Implement proper security measures for API interactions

Signatures

Staking Key

EKjJikFMaWp6Kx3JPi6PRNqANutX8LCAsQnCd2UCu621: EvE98ertctrgVwCBmucGVj7LripoQJYsDHmCxhfoVPRnLnssK7MYFNewZhDYHyPDzuJ9deJGaVR3TuA1HMChjJtvntfbRzcLLdydvAt2xHav7XC6qDKGKvpKCtyLutkjk2sR8fCu2KMyNLXKqHm7oiURwdUeZtYG76RJs8ycUqAmLe3gUrQvvQhzTq7MT4fGX6UXy5MZuKAC8w2veauPvKoUm1fmSLnSDuyyCKs7ycJKUmZKXBmk4SRtrDYgo2fhDMSZgCZatV6c

Public Key

CXaf1KgZ3emsz9DoERxggja4xrtNYvWn8CDHzcybTqqc: 85GUU23CvbQyXXwpKMeYUhrYB4WDdWoshe1t4rGKqUM8iN6zFp8G5KkK2t3yE7Tn6i3mAsZYthCEf7RTRkgZzP2r3AgXmGcKK6r6Mj5RcykTZjZHkmfsxGienhYG4ChKbD3rWwDcrSGpR7kyJKKsf6XC36Gwk17xf9AWqiKNyGs58LN8hwyzNoBSbT6wL1uXdVsD8QSfuskNV4yyaTUsC6MbzDG134nEm2x5T9aeYoDvh98Q471UMZgnzqgy2g9C4a9dSscwcL1S

@Aflame7121
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests pass but lack comprehensive coverage
  • File structure does not match specified requirements
  • Mocking approach in tests is simplistic

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests
  • Detailed edge case testing

Action Items

  • Restructure project to have implementation in /src directory
  • Move tests to /tests directory
  • Enhance test coverage to include more edge cases and error scenarios
  • Implement more robust error handling tests
  • Add performance and resource usage tests

Signatures

Staking Key

63GuD6KX1ZByaB7nsnCuGZe2HfY4HfcMnHqHhiDXeAdf: CJmqoGzeWLFTAozg18bkGNJ3eogmmTs3xZmWtSJsP6HizWd9NVhFhnJHSvDbMRSCzXZt4G7EJFFwjP7CupuxhKQgaBRqC9vGVbCfMWuwB8zZnekicgRTDWErpGyFJKnDe3YkgcrWQBp5WdC4KSHe5BRaxFPSKX3mUY8aidA9rN5t9vobqTte4pU3Dfbxkw3Q2RK4JofxCVJcSWSyVD6RBXUMKzLeHEx5E2YZ6182pQgUi5H8wWr76k1Vjxt4jWG7W99wGxWxTHFr

Public Key

1NifZwcKG5w2PzYmaXHGstHzkrxM7A923ZCswopNvxW: 7qzW9ow6wdbBAoqjhhY111S1f9CFyJfJGicNvXdgc12WoyVBL6ggrVgKxVB9JnYVfGufP19kaZjdfzLHDtHnypZVKDXtgFBxfkzdQvAZyfhmr5DBG2yFkbdQ1UJ3QYVhQckthiWqdAXzzmoteGdAvMb61wDmgVcA2qPRwG1SBTn7rGbosZc7qb1GVJ8iyKUs5wvsMTS1aXCsPdHyRXvZgL359goerMDEZYLd2PfxbxuNFQybW4KoDFeuGcqs4NYqpPyKAxnnwFNc

@KOIIFLONG
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests are present but lack comprehensive coverage
  • Current implementation is spread across multiple files
  • Test files use heavy mocking which may not reflect real-world scenarios

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory
  • Some files outside of /src and /tests have been modified

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive edge case testing
  • Input validation tests
  • Error handling tests
  • Performance and resource tests

Action Items

  • Consolidate implementation into a single file in /src directory
  • Move tests to a single file in /tests directory
  • Improve test coverage to include edge cases and error handling
  • Reduce reliance on mocking in tests
  • Add input validation and error handling tests
  • Implement performance and resource usage tests

Signatures

Staking Key

9y1hePH2jyZgwS3hmo9VgECJVNi4WU9nLcSUnwzUdWE1: G7vzKPmFoUzdr7PJbyU2oQHjSsWXyNUfKvC8kfJkatrA35ymvKRnQUe5NZ33ycg29jX96rcugqvcKAo3L8haQpw8wrjcAkjuNNUEbro5SG3MQezuvhicPbxsjp1dBzLGTLQpS6yxzgrDdUrYUKH1GiGyTndS1PmHnRbRcNKryCfpWHkUkUhcUFJ5gqtMQbMEcoQ4MFvbedurTvegYLZ9gkW8dKXS5aAnz4s4Yo8YgN9kvH8xVtYBjmd5WoNrx6s8MYFgYMuMQLJY

Public Key

dnCa75F4jkjfLVYD1itSCiSRjDYnTVp2EGp5aTSaTow: AthAnGcbsCYR3QfMdfEsNBLyBrv4FDLBgaaAhC5fh2a5pG6HitSCpnJ59FwzzTwhydCSvhHbyBx45hZfgAZ5sioM2HHVwpLUoK5NcuA4MtF7ZtLVUghb6C69oRuRnZhwGWjbLQxoeDxMQ8zMAkRWPriCpeJrcP9ArF1UdVVvRRmeTUqhQ9MPHgnt5CUv1aFG6vow3hL7r5yj6mTLW6CZRKwyaa4DjdbLUBgtb91WjxpSfR2cqZWnQws2ykktV8Kot3Vvq6auM1At

@Hattrix3
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Core functionality exists but needs better organization
  • Tests pass but lack comprehensive coverage
  • File structure does not match specified requirements

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests
  • Comprehensive edge case testing

Action Items

  • Move implementation files to /src directory
  • Move test files to /tests directory
  • Improve test coverage for error handling and edge cases
  • Add more comprehensive unit tests
  • Implement proper error handling and logging
  • Remove hardcoded credentials and sensitive information

Signatures

Staking Key

Hy7aRKCGWYy37QH85WLFeZ88Bf4J4hCGL7mFd2k7Uzkk: 9yigdGKM8QpShyrCFynN4cdvvsKeVcsBRkxP7iy6QXjtXxC3ZQuNTL7Z2FCHYuLGC12Vk7yQfiKGtEeQDPgWbqmWtmUEqe1jw75gq7iJ5Ac8JNsLkePb91PitXwTkkb1uyTcFj6nRDp7aG9B9QYK9myAEeqnnuVXucWWFAWZFzgaCw9AvDMVJomyLcSgs1zQqcfkmkdtWDnPpehMxrF9Z4HMsaRX7arVKQtzNTtARRyGVgSwsknxcTxQ6xgBsQSJAUrcz56Dy4gU

Public Key

G8aHcRbPzW59RaaATue3mqUNRcCbSfQrWCSNW1CQvmgR: CH6QMRiTUUqNkuu2i89isV5dK1X4NbYyCGSs3fWyL7uWvZG5CC2QTiWgWGxHABVDJ1svr5s5Q7HfLH6yBUH97xwzVMU9CAiZyMswkSHJ77WXqU9cdwv5y9GQfXr4p46GhzejBu6Mnk2dK6S8H8mSdN4ZCjCFgHcsFvj1An4kLgGA9vLNBki8QKzFB1YJZKr7NaLwdhKyJtg2r9tWpyuE7HZBWpTivwzDXXTMQFysR9m4y6VKpc2jXNiJxVnLbs6qT2jQYPfoxCWg

@Alexdyn1927
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests pass technically but lack comprehensive coverage
  • Code is not structured in recommended directory layout
  • Mocks are used extensively but do not thoroughly test actual functionality

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests
  • Detailed edge case tests
  • Input validation tests

Action Items

  • Move implementation files to /src directory
  • Move test files to /tests directory
  • Enhance test coverage to include more edge cases
  • Add error handling and input validation tests
  • Remove hardcoded credentials in AJAX calls
  • Implement more robust error handling in AJAX requests
  • Add performance and resource usage tests

Signatures

Staking Key

EasyALNTzoKwgHMHDTnRfwXBSjqvfvghYDRzbrWsP54D: FCRJAbdcy3dsaHFPG62kN5xQjNwr83AYJb39WbLXSde1jzGhcftpXen4DEjtjgGxxd9K2K41AunDbnZLAban6J6tnq5uoo5MGTJN81Tqe1CjLSfd91ZyKyi15FCP2jwgnhcWhWFeizkNzHtmmM4fmY8EhSC8w7Q2LCMXDurM5E1VRdJ43szevneXorrLAXo7anubEfYxgQf5vEn2a23auoiDeEv3mD2cAMYkQf5VRDnjY3KZCPNrzyCaDt3aFtPZhbp9kWymYpRS

Public Key

3UXKxq2Y6pi2Zs71LKMnmssuA3JhjGsFRW1SsP9WRgTw: 5MYf2MDKTkbykk6HyVRz3UhcvP7eD8n3mRWmsU7ytkdpPqVKL8qtHiTUkMm5Y2qh8eJaxNDgwF1wFQ8oq1yUghMgrTxSTUW3ozhSeJGYTJBgGc2WGXpvkrZdKEvb2P5B9D6CKQYSUBoGFP4tyZKsXrp9Tk8btgToUyCKMgLwwELCk64o7pTEu8MMfgsh6xU3DkPNDVj8HkKeJaageggNiHMoXaHy3zBBstRGX4ovJCLv11PhpLDP43BXbqKxgq939diyDYUfNKWU

@CryptoSCK
Copy link

MailGeek Chrome Extension Implementation

Description

Chrome Extension for email tracking and interaction

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests exist but lack comprehensive coverage
  • Project structure does not match specified requirements
  • Core functionality is partially implemented

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests
  • Comprehensive edge case testing
  • Input validation tests

Action Items

  • Restructure project to have implementation in /src directory
  • Move tests to /tests directory
  • Enhance test coverage for error handling
  • Add more comprehensive input validation tests
  • Implement resource cleanup and performance tests

Signatures

Staking Key

941izj4WsQqBwNLsSgDf3BSKS1dJMbS1q9d2o23ZjBHp: Fjd3anTFeWuJdbDgxJyk6iax64M9yB1MXTX8GW2X6RtoNfHSw8oALsyumU5dkPZhERkDPrHYuKvsUwo92N6eRP7xSCTDnE47FPT8nF1TBSWGjgCBAW5CRq53JMvUo3aZKjxcDRuZwaeboFjDqqcsz1Lc6avaVzLP42mHr3yQCnFns2NuTPcjY6XGSLwyfDXyYbfeQvhRARKn6mXpcFCdgZAZRjKJDNtYCq27mkR9wTA4qbRGqea34CNsZhXtL2a2D8WvoMZLn1nL

Public Key

EWghpH7Xb9HL74TitMBog5Vow8nFjpdJfNCa6hc2wfca: 5iPFUAYiSekMbu4ZeH4ZJ63PNbqgwN9f3wFrmUTBC5VqAGjDLLTvho9Vg12jQDhkTi5K13gWVGe3tbPPfhFurwmB3h3bCyMZskhbKapuyRwmmN2W5AYwC3458kMsNsrKXUXufsDye3wVzDWT75owxKmLhQB19VUrH1eY8r1JZSvgkyhDCtGYpn545CmaA6WYqGynqWrE7FgpZ12k8ry3pFG3YVvFMeWQWdKZ1aqikBVGSAJSPWGmbTEpVRKax9s9kuYRHv2NLV2k

@Ralfmal
Copy link

Ralfmal commented May 23, 2025

MailGeek Chrome Extension Review

Description

Review of MailGeek Chrome Extension implementation and tests

Recommendation

REVISE

Reasons:

  • Tests pass but lack comprehensive coverage
  • File structure does not match specified requirements
  • Potential security concerns with hardcoded credentials

Unmet Requirements

  • Implementation is not in a single file in the /src directory
  • Tests are not in a single file in the /tests directory

Tests

Failed Tests

No failing tests

Missing Test Cases

  • Comprehensive error handling tests
  • Input validation tests
  • Performance and resource usage tests

Action Items

  • Move source files to /src directory
  • Move test files to /tests directory
  • Implement more robust error handling and input validation tests
  • Remove hardcoded credentials
  • Add comprehensive test coverage for edge cases
  • Implement secure authentication mechanism

Signatures

Staking Key

3xQbq9mdMksp9N7ZrshCYvUmr1dTUnAfXQGP6B4AwStt: FHVRyp7Hmt2N26kZzaMjF46JCmbvzxUcYF9dxNJM993YPsHRokXHt7EMQLXZYmi2GcbBuP61uzGupKv3Go8HjVwV4KHn2ep7t3XHxwdJY2k185AA52iUywrmnj4DeNVtav8oAfoo4VFhePEVwcRni95o3JWYp8fuVBKBgK66uN34HyYBRyN2iFY6gN5Yye74fwet6RbNc2KKegZkKMfVn1UZTkqKWpYTHsJS97rsU9XYQ9CK3MteG6Ep5AcpBg4Cbu34LuG9gRoz

Public Key

Hm6epzunYc7F1Bqyzk64r5LWWNqVuExDFRr36AUQmFPt: CUwyQbXquFsodR8Z1GN7U6e6vfYoXPJZLHU6j3U4AEbUdL5cv9fCxYmZ99dKog9WNizLLdwx87KA4K6szcXKLzRumx7HtcVck2bas1iaQvfyDY7gbWK6XuNmPnNCFhVyZeLHFm7oRtcJiRuXu6fWjZVefqRUBWQRjBKXn53Rh9TbwkhLBZoRmN3B4rp8m4tYr39Uu87qL3ajTrZKrUCyW1fst3FKuNuoFpkxpBFMgkE9omfq4NPdvV89GHgjRnp4z6adgGcxTEqi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.