Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Added 4 comprehensive tests targeting the previously uncovered AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync method in UnfoldAsyncEnumerator, achieving 100% coverage for the entire AsyncSeqOp module. This represents a significant improvement in test coverage for a core internal functionality.

Problems Found

  • AsyncSeqOp Module: Had 81.8% coverage with uncovered FoldAsync method (lines 305-313) in UnfoldAsyncEnumerator
  • Missing Test Coverage: The FoldAsync path in unfold-based sequences was completely untested despite being critical functionality
  • Edge Case Gap: No tests for empty sequences, exception propagation in generators, or exception handling in fold operations

Actions Taken

Core Functionality Tests (4 tests):

  1. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with unfoldAsync should work - Tests the main FoldAsync code path using unfoldAsync-generated sequences
  2. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with empty sequence should return init - Tests edge case with empty unfold sequences
  3. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with exception in generator should propagate - Tests exception handling in the unfold generator
  4. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with exception in folder should propagate - Tests exception handling in the fold operation

Technical Details:

  • Target Coverage: Specifically designed to hit lines 305-313 in UnfoldAsyncEnumerator.FoldAsync
  • Approach: Used AsyncSeq.unfoldAsync to create sequences that utilize UnfoldAsyncEnumerator, then applied foldAsync operations
  • Edge Cases: Covered empty sequences, generator exceptions, and folder exceptions
  • Error Handling: Ensured proper exception propagation through the async fold pipeline

Changes in Test Coverage Achieved

Before:

  • Overall Line Coverage: 88.3% (1,070/1,211 lines)
  • Branch Coverage: 75.1% (191/254 branches)
  • Method Coverage: 91.2% (554/607 methods)
  • AsyncSeqOp: 81.8% coverage (36/44 lines) ❌
  • Test Count: 157

After:

  • Overall Line Coverage: 89.0% (1,079/1,211 lines) ⬆️ +0.7%
  • Branch Coverage: 76.3% (194/254 branches) ⬆️ +1.2%
  • Method Coverage: 92.2% (560/607 methods) ⬆️ +1.0%
  • AsyncSeqOp: 100% coverage (44/44 lines) ⬆️ +18.2%
  • Test Count: 161 (+4 tests) ✅

Major Achievement: AsyncSeqOp module now has 100% coverage!

Net Impact:

  • +9 lines covered (strategic coverage of previously untested core functionality)
  • +3 branches covered (exception handling and control flow paths)
  • +6 methods covered (complete AsyncSeqOp method coverage)
  • +4 meaningful tests (comprehensive edge case and error handling validation)

End-to-End Cumulative Impact From All Daily Test Coverage Improver Work

Based on issue #180 tracking, the total improvement from the Daily Test Coverage Improver workflow:

  • Starting Coverage: ~86% (initial baseline)
  • Current Coverage: 89.0%
  • Total Improvement: +3.0% overall line coverage
  • AsyncSeqExtensions: 0% → 100% coverage
  • Seq Module: 0% → 100% coverage
  • AsyncSeqOp: 81.8% → 100% coverage
  • Total Tests Added: 157 → 161 tests (+27 tests across all PRs)

The repository now maintains excellent coverage with comprehensive testing of async patterns, edge cases, and error handling scenarios.

Validation

  • ✅ All 161 tests pass successfully (4 new + 157 existing)
  • ✅ Build succeeds without warnings
  • ✅ Tests properly validate expected behavior including exception propagation
  • ✅ Coverage metrics improved significantly across all categories
  • ✅ AsyncSeqOp module achieved 100% coverage milestone

Commands to validate coverage numbers

dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" --results-directory ./coverage
reportgenerator -reports:"coverage/**/coverage.cobertura.xml" -targetdir:"coverage/report" -reporttypes:"JsonSummary"
cat coverage/report/Summary.json

This improvement focuses on achieving complete coverage for the AsyncSeqOp module while adding meaningful tests that enhance the robustness of the AsyncSeq library's core unfolding and folding operations.

Bash commands executed
  • git checkout -b feature/advanced-coverage-improvements-fold-utils
  • dotnet build --no-restore
  • dotnet test --logger "console;verbosity=minimal" --no-build
  • dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage" --results-directory ./coverage-new
  • reportgenerator -reports:"coverage-new/**/coverage.cobertura.xml" -targetdir:"coverage-new/report" -reporttypes:"JsonSummary"
  • git add tests/FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq.Tests/AsyncSeqTests.fs
  • git commit -m "..."
  • git push -u origin feature/advanced-coverage-improvements-fold-utils
Web searches performed

None - worked with existing codebase analysis and coverage reports.

Web pages fetched

None - worked with existing codebase analysis and coverage reports.

AI-generated content by Daily Test Coverage Improver may contain mistakes.

…c tests

## Summary
Added 4 targeted tests specifically to improve coverage of the AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync
method in UnfoldAsyncEnumerator, achieving 100% coverage for AsyncSeqOp module.

## Coverage Improvements
**Before:**
- Overall Line Coverage: 88.3% (1,070/1,211 lines)
- Branch Coverage: 75.1% (191/254 branches)
- Method Coverage: 91.2% (554/607 methods)
- AsyncSeqOp: 81.8% coverage (36/44 lines)
- Test Count: 157

**After:**
- Overall Line Coverage: 89.0% (1,079/1,211 lines) ⬆️ +0.7%
- Branch Coverage: 76.3% (194/254 branches) ⬆️ +1.2%
- Method Coverage: 92.2% (560/607 methods) ⬆️ +1.0%
- AsyncSeqOp: 100% coverage (44/44 lines) ⬆️ +18.2%
- Test Count: 161 ⬆️ +4 tests

## Tests Added
1. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with unfoldAsync should work - Core functionality test
2. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with empty sequence should return init - Edge case
3. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with exception in generator should propagate - Error handling
4. AsyncSeqOp.FoldAsync with exception in folder should propagate - Error handling

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@dsyme dsyme merged commit 9d27cca into main Aug 29, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants