Skip to content

Conversation

@DanielRhee
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@DanielRhee DanielRhee linked an issue Jan 8, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@DanielRhee DanielRhee self-assigned this Jan 8, 2026
@goob10000
Copy link
Member

Not sure if I was supposed to understand the physics behind Ackerman but looks fine? Some thoughts are that we should have 2 sets of params to choose from at beginning of simulation, fs-3 and fs-4. Something even smarter might be setting up params that define different car parts like tire params for each type of tire we use. And then steering for fs-3, steering fs-4. Something like that. Also if we want the simulation to be more accurate we should really be using Runge Kutta probably rather than a riemann sum. May matter less since we have constant energy input/output but when doing simpler simulations it made a huge difference for conservation of energy.

@DanielRhee
Copy link
Contributor Author

DanielRhee commented Jan 8, 2026

yeah i agree i'll make that change to fs3/fs4 param selector. A lot of the things are still fs2 as well, like the polar moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ackermann Geometry Optimiation

3 participants