-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
[in_app_purchase] fix 176757 and 172434 #10678
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…g reported as restored, which left transactions
…celled/pending/unverified results to purchaseStream.
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests or get an explicit test exemption before merging. If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. If you believe this PR qualifies for a test exemption, contact "@test-exemption-reviewer" in the #hackers channel in Discord (don't just cc them here, they won't see it!). The test exemption team is a small volunteer group, so all reviewers should feel empowered to ask for tests, without delegating that responsibility entirely to the test exemption group. |
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces two important fixes for StoreKit 2. First, it corrects an issue where new consumable purchases were incorrectly marked as restored by explicitly passing a flag to indicate when a transaction is part of a restore operation. Second, it ensures that non-successful purchase outcomes, such as cancellations or pending transactions, are now correctly reported to the purchaseStream. The changes in Swift and Dart seem correct and directly address the described issues. I have one suggestion regarding the CHANGELOG formatting to align with common repository practices.
|
An existing Git SHA, To re-trigger presubmits after closing or re-opeing a PR, or pushing a HEAD commit (i.e. with |
Fixes StoreKit 2 consumable purchases being reported as restored, which left transactions unfinished and blocked repeat buys.
Fixes StoreKit 2 purchase flow to send cancelled/pending/unverified results to purchaseStream.
flutter/flutter#172434
flutter/flutter#176757
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]pubspec.yamlwith an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or I have commented below to indicate which version change exemption this PR falls under1.CHANGELOG.mdto add a description of the change, following repository CHANGELOG style, or I have commented below to indicate which CHANGELOG exemption this PR falls under1.///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the
gemini-code-assistbot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2 ↩3