test(pkg/ddc/goosefs): add Ginkgo tests for backup_data.go#5472
test(pkg/ddc/goosefs): add Ginkgo tests for backup_data.go#5472hxrshxz wants to merge 3 commits intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @hxrshxz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a comprehensive suite of Ginkgo tests for the GooseFS data backup functionality, specifically targeting the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Hi @hxrshxz. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds Ginkgo tests for the GooseFS data backup functionality, significantly improving test coverage. The tests cover various failure scenarios and basic success cases. My review focuses on improving the assertions in the success-case tests to make them more robust and ensure they correctly validate the behavior they are intended to test. Specifically, I've suggested parsing the generated YAML file and checking the values of key fields instead of just checking for the existence of substrings or successful file creation.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5472 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 61.29% 61.29%
=======================================
Files 444 444
Lines 30540 30540
=======================================
Hits 18720 18720
Misses 10277 10277
Partials 1543 1543 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a comprehensive suite of Ginkgo tests for the backup_data.go file, significantly improving test coverage for the GooseFS data backup functionality. The tests are well-structured, covering a variety of success and failure scenarios, including input validation, error handling, and different runtime configurations. My feedback focuses on enhancing test maintainability by reducing code duplication and strengthening test assertions to ensure the correctness of the generated output. Overall, this is a solid contribution that boosts the reliability of the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Harsh <harshmastic@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh <harshmastic@gmail.com>
hxrshxz
force-pushed
the
test/goosefs-backup-data
branch
from
25d97fa to
9773dce
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds Ginkgo/Gomega unit test coverage for GooseFS generateDataBackupValueFile (data-backup value YAML generation), aligning with the project’s ongoing migration to Ginkgo and goal of raising overall test coverage.
Changes:
- Introduces a comprehensive Ginkgo test suite for
pkg/ddc/goosefs/backup_data.govalue-file generation. - Covers several failure paths (wrong object type, missing runtime, HA master pod resolution failure, invalid backup path, affinity injection failure).
- Adds success-path coverage for RunAs precedence, HA replicas behavior, and worker-image defaulting behavior.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Harsh <harshmastic@gmail.com>
|
1 participant
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Adds Ginkgo test coverage for GooseFS backup data functionality that previously had 0% coverage
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
part of #5407
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Tests for generateDataBackupValueFile covering invalid input objects, missing runtime, HA master pod failures, invalid backup paths, affinity injection failures, RunAs configurations, and default image handling.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
go test ./pkg/ddc/goosefs/... -v -run "BackupData"Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews