-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Move input coroutine management variables to TLS #11576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
runderwo
wants to merge
4
commits into
fluent:master
Choose a base branch
from
runderwo:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: fluent/fluent-bit
Length of output: 103
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: fluent/fluent-bit
Length of output: 3099
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: fluent/fluent-bit
Length of output: 4123
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: fluent/fluent-bit
Length of output: 908
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: fluent/fluent-bit
Length of output: 204
Eliminate the unsafe assertion by propagating allocation/setup errors.
The assertion at line 617 assumes
paramsis set, butinput_params_set()returnsvoidand silently fails ifflb_calloc()orpthread_setspecific()fails. When the coroutine resumes and callsinput_pre_cb_collect(), the assertion aborts instead of failing cleanly. Additionally, the__threaddeclaration ofpthread_key_tis incorrect—pthread keys are global identifiers, not thread-local variables—andpthread_key_create()should not be called per-coroutine.Required changes:
input_params_set()return an error code (e.g.,intwith 0 for success)flb_input_coro_collect()and unwind coroutine creation on failureinput_pre_cb_collect()with proper error handling or a fatal log if params is NULL (after confirming bootstrap succeeded)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cosmo0920 Is this an acceptable way to bail out while surfacing the problem in this rare condition? Alternatives would seem to require significant refactoring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.